Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs Continental ContiVanContact 200 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 20 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Urban Terrain T/A is ahead, 75–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Urban Terrain T/A +19
    55
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7749

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74

    ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Urban Terrain T/A +19
    57
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7951

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 76

    ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    Urban Terrain T/A +19
    54
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7547

    Urban Terrain T/A: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73

    ContiVanContact 200: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 46.7 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 75

    Treadwear

    Urban Terrain T/A +34
    41
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AContiVanContact 200
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online8025

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 80.2 = 75

    ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 24.7 = 41

    No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Urban Terrain T/A +21
    53
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AContiVanContact 200
    Reviews found online7453
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs Continental ContiVanContact 200: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/AContinental ContiVanContact 200
Relative Score 75 53
Dry 74 55
Wet 76 57
Snow 70 –
Comfort 73 54
Treadwear 75 41
Handling (owners) 74 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Urban Terrain T/A

± 8

ContiVanContact 200

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Urban Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
  • Comfortable ride quality with good impact absorption

Cons

  • Higher road noise compared to standard highway or summer tires
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy/rolling resistance
  • Average braking and handling performance when pushed to extremes
All owner themes in the Urban Terrain T/A review

Tire B ContiVanContact 200

Pros

  • Strong initial grip and handling performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Comfortable ride quality
  • Acceptable fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Significant loss of wet-weather traction as the tread depth decreases
  • Pronounced uneven wear patterns, specifically scalloping and outer-edge degradation
All owner themes in the ContiVanContact 200 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A B · Continental ContiVanContact 200
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverVan
Sizes available1816
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 17″
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A

Continental ContiVanContact 200

Winner: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiVanContact 200 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 41 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 76 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Tire B · Continental ContiVanContact 200

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?

Which is better in the wet, Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 76 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 74 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 41 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology