Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 20 reviews
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs Continental ContiVanContact 200 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 20 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Urban Terrain T/A is ahead, 75–53
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Urban Terrain T/A +1955Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A ContiVanContact 200 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 77 49 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55
No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
76
Wet
Urban Terrain T/A +1957Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A ContiVanContact 200 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 79 51 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 76
ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A ContiVanContact 200 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 70 – Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
73
Comfort
Urban Terrain T/A +1954Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A ContiVanContact 200 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 75 47 Urban Terrain T/A: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73
ContiVanContact 200: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 46.7 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
75
Treadwear
Urban Terrain T/A +3441Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A ContiVanContact 200 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 80 25 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 80.2 = 75
ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 24.7 = 41
No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Urban Terrain T/A +2153Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A ContiVanContact 200 Reviews found online 74 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A | Continental ContiVanContact 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 53 |
| Dry | 74 | 55 |
| Wet | 76 | 57 |
| Snow | 70 | – |
| Comfort | 73 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 41 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Urban Terrain T/A
ContiVanContact 200
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Urban Terrain T/A
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Comfortable ride quality with good impact absorption
Cons
- Higher road noise compared to standard highway or summer tires
- Slight negative impact on fuel economy/rolling resistance
- Average braking and handling performance when pushed to extremes
Tire B ContiVanContact 200
Pros
- Strong initial grip and handling performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Comfortable ride quality
- Acceptable fuel efficiency
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant loss of wet-weather traction as the tread depth decreases
- Pronounced uneven wear patterns, specifically scalloping and outer-edge degradation
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A | B · Continental ContiVanContact 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Van |
| Sizes available | 18 | 16 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Continental ContiVanContact 200
Winner: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiVanContact 200 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 41 on treadwear.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 53 on handling.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 55 on dry.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 76 vs 57 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?
Which is better in the wet, Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 76 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 74 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Urban Terrain T/A or ContiVanContact 200?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 41 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology