Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs Continental Cross Contact A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Urban Terrain T/A is ahead, 72–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Urban Terrain T/A +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7662

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Urban Terrain T/A +11
    64
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7763

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 68

    Snow

    Urban Terrain T/A +15
    53
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6741

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Urban Terrain T/A +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7460

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 72

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    Urban Terrain T/A +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/ACross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7464

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 71

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Urban Terrain T/A +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/ACross Contact A/T
    Reviews found online7462
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs Continental Cross Contact A/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/AContinental Cross Contact A/T
Relative Score 72 62
Dry 73 64
Wet 75 64
Snow 68 53
Comfort 72 65
Treadwear 71 65
Handling (owners) 74 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Urban Terrain T/A

Cross Contact A/T

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Urban Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability across various vehicle types.
  • Strong traction and confidence in winter conditions, including snow and slush.
  • Reliable off-road capability on loose surfaces like mud, wet grass, and gravel.

Cons

  • Higher levels of road noise compared to standard highway or OEM tires.
  • Noticeable impact on fuel efficiency for some users.
  • Not intended for high-speed, performance-oriented driving.
All owner themes in the Urban Terrain T/A review

Tire B Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A B · Continental Cross Contact A/T
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available18—
Rim diameters15″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Winner: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 68 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 73 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Tire B · Continental Cross Contact A/T

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

Which is better in the wet, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 68 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 71 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology