Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 19 reviews
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs Continental Cross Contact A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Urban Terrain T/A is ahead, 72–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Urban Terrain T/A +964Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 76 62 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
Urban Terrain T/A +1164Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 77 63 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Snow
Urban Terrain T/A +1553Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 67 41 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
Urban Terrain T/A +765Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 60 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 72
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Urban Terrain T/A +665Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 74 64 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 71
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Urban Terrain T/A +1262Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Cross Contact A/T Reviews found online 74 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A | Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 62 |
| Dry | 73 | 64 |
| Wet | 75 | 64 |
| Snow | 68 | 53 |
| Comfort | 72 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Urban Terrain T/A
Cross Contact A/T
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Urban Terrain T/A
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability across various vehicle types.
- Strong traction and confidence in winter conditions, including snow and slush.
- Reliable off-road capability on loose surfaces like mud, wet grass, and gravel.
Cons
- Higher levels of road noise compared to standard highway or OEM tires.
- Noticeable impact on fuel efficiency for some users.
- Not intended for high-speed, performance-oriented driving.
Tire B Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A | B · Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Winner: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 68 vs 53 on snow.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 62 on handling.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 64 on wet.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 73 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
Which is better in the wet, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 68 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Urban Terrain T/A or Cross Contact A/T?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 71 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology