tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 20 + 373 owner reviews. How we score

Urban Terrain T/A is ahead, 74–68

Check price on Amazon · Urban Terrain T/A or Grabber A/TX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Urban Terrain T/A +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7768

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Urban Terrain T/A +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7974

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 76

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Urban Terrain T/A +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    Urban Terrain T/A +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7558

    Urban Terrain T/A: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Urban Terrain T/A +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8072

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 80.2 = 75

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Urban Terrain T/A +15
    59
    Why this score
    SourceUrban Terrain T/AGrabber A/TX
    Reviews found online7459
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/AGeneral Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 74 68
Dry 74 68
Wet 76 73
Snow 70 68
Comfort 73 61
Noise – 64
Treadwear 75 70
Handling (owners) 74 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Urban Terrain T/A

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Urban Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
  • Comfortable ride quality with good impact absorption

Cons

  • Higher road noise compared to standard highway or summer tires
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy/rolling resistance
  • Average braking and handling performance when pushed to extremes
All owner themes in the Urban Terrain T/A review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

r/4Runner ·16 upvotes ·2020-10-11

“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
jeepforum.com ·2021-10-12

“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available1844
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 22″
Tread depth—14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A

General Grabber A/TX

Winner: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 73 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 70 on treadwear.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Urban Terrain T/A or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, Urban Terrain T/A or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 76 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Urban Terrain T/A or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Urban Terrain T/A or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Urban Terrain T/A or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Urban Terrain T/A or Grabber A/TX?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology