Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 1,053 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes CF2 SUV is ahead, 67–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Alenza 001

Alenza 001

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 1,053 reviews

“A lot of our cars come with that Bridgestone. Often need replacement at only 30k km. They are also very sensitive to alignment, even slight off and the tires will wear unevenly and get noisy. Still better than the Dunlops though.”

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Tire BToyo

Proxes CF2 SUV

Summer

± 8

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Proxes CF2 SUV +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza 001Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 62 (est.)56
    Reviews found online5573

    Alenza 001: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 72.5 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Proxes CF2 SUV +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza 001Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 65 (est.)65
    Reviews found online6072

    Alenza 001: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 65.4 + 40% × 71.6 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Comfort

    Proxes CF2 SUV +17
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza 001Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 64 (est.)62
    Reviews found online4675

    Alenza 001: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.8 = 53

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 40% × 61.8 + 60% × 75.2 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza 001Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–67
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes CF2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 55

    Treadwear

    Proxes CF2 SUV +15
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza 001Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4772

    Alenza 001: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 55

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 55

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes CF2 SUV +17
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza 001Proxes CF2 SUV
    Reviews found online5572
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza 001Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–56
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Alenza 001 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Alenza 001Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Relative Score 59 67
Dry 59 62
Wet 63 68
Comfort 53 70
Noise – 67
Treadwear 55 70
Handling (owners) 55 72
Efficiency – 56

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Alenza 001

± 8

Proxes CF2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Alenza 001

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet grip with confident handling
  • Stable and precise high-speed motorway performance
  • Good overall tread life and mileage for many drivers

Cons

  • Noticeable and occasionally loud road noise, especially as the tire wears
  • Firm and harsh ride quality, notably worsened in run-flat (RFT) versions
  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers or specific vehicle setups
All owner themes in the Alenza 001 review

Tire B Proxes CF2 SUV

Pros

  • Significantly quieter and smoother ride compared to stock or competitor tires
  • Excellent dry grip and handling performance
  • Good value for money with favorable durability and wear characteristics

Cons

  • Wet grip performance may degrade or feel less confident over time for some users
  • Occasional low-frequency rolling noise noted on rough road surfaces
  • Wet weather traction can reach its limits during spirited cornering
All owner themes in the Proxes CF2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Alenza 001

Mixed

Community opinions on the Bridgestone Alenza 001 are split, largely depending on whether they are the run-flat variants. Many drivers praise their dry and wet handling, corner stability, and initial ride quality, while others criticize them for a harsh ride, noise, buzzy feedback on rough asphalt, and relatively fast treadwear. As original equipment (OE) tires on performance SUVs and crossovers, they are generally seen as capable in warm weather but poorly suited for cold temperatures, snow, or long-term tread life.

clublexus.com

“If you don't drive your car hard and need a good all around all weather tire, it is a fine choice. The only reason it's predominantly labeled an SUV tire is because it comes OEM on a bunch of SUVs like the highlander, etc and likely has a weight rating to accommodate. It works for the LC because the LC weighs as much or more than most crossover/SUVs such as the grand highlander does. edit: if you got the Alenza 001 which is a runflat tire it's going to be loud, as all run flat tires are.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-02-01

“A lot of our cars come with that Bridgestone. Often need replacement at only 30k km. They are also very sensitive to alignment, even slight off and the tires will wear unevenly and get noisy. Still better than the Dunlops though.”

bimmerfest.com ·1 upvote ·2023-10-02

“If you're not satisfied with the ride, blame that on the Alenza 001 being a run-flat. Those Michelin Lattitude Sport 3 ZP tires are also run-flats. BMWoB ( BMW of Bubbaville) routinely lowers the tire pressures in their loaner cars with run-flat- tires , so people won't hate the ride and buy an Audi next time. I make a point of putting my loaner cars' tire pressures back where they're supposed to be... and that makes them ride like crap. Hopefully, you bought your X3 with the optional spare tires . That gives you the option of going with non-run-flats. The gold standard in non-run-flats in those sizes are the Michelin PS 4S (summer, max-performance) and PS A/S 4 (all-season, ultra-high-performance). Don't throw your OE Bridgestones away. There's a pretty good demand for them as used tires for lease-turn-in. BMW FS requires 4/32" of tread at lease turn-in or they can hit you with a $300/tire "excess tire wear fee."”

Top themes
#Handling and Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Run-Flat Performance#Treadwear and Longevity#Cold Weather and Snow Limitations#Original Equipment (OE) Fitment

Based on 23 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Alenza 001 B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available7329
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG400 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Alenza 001

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Winner: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 70 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 72 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 70 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 68 vs 63 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza 001
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Alenza 001 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Alenza 001 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 68 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza 001 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 62 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Alenza 001 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 70 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Alenza 001 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 70 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology