tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler A/T 001 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dueler A/T 001 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDueler A/T 001DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6777

    Dueler A/T 001: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Dueler A/T 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDueler A/T 001DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7376

    Dueler A/T 001: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 72

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Dueler A/T 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDueler A/T 001DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–59

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 64

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDueler A/T 001DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6474

    Dueler A/T 001: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 63.9 = 65

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler A/T 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDueler A/T 001DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDueler A/T 001DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6778

    Dueler A/T 001: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler A/T 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDueler A/T 001DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6870
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Dueler A/T 001Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 69 73
Dry 67 74
Wet 72 74
Snow – 64
Comfort 65 73
Noise – 69
Treadwear 67 73
Handling (owners) 68 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dueler A/T 001

± 7

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler A/T 001

Pros

  • Excellent all-round grip and handling on dry, wet, and off-road surfaces
  • Solid tread longevity and durability over tens of thousands of kilometers
  • Sharper handling response compared to standard touring tyres

Cons

  • Lower lateral grip and average performance in deep snow
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls requiring higher inflation pressures
  • Potential compromise on grip when adjustments are made to counter sidewall bounce
All owner themes in the Dueler A/T 001 review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler A/T 001 B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4029
Rim diameters8″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG300 B B560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common2020

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler A/T 001

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Dueler A/T 001 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler A/T 001
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler A/T 001 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler A/T 001 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler A/T 001 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler A/T 001 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dueler A/T 001 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology