Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 9 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 218 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Dueler H/T 687 55, Dynapro AT2 56.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Dueler H/T 687 +156Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 51 50 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
55
Wet
Dynapro AT2 +358Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 50 54 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 49.5 = 55
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 58
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
Dynapro AT2 +161Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 52 55 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 60
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 61
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
53
Comfort
Dueler H/T 687 +152Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 45 45 Dueler H/T 687: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.2 = 53
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.8 = 52
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
59
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 59
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Dynapro AT2 +255Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 44 48 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 53
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
48
Handling (owners)
Dueler H/T 687 +147Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Dynapro AT2 Reviews found online 48 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 | Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 56 |
| Dry | 57 | 56 |
| Wet | 55 | 58 |
| Snow | 60 | 61 |
| Comfort | 53 | 52 |
| Noise | 59 | – |
| Treadwear | 53 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
55
/ 100
Dueler H/T 687
56
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/T 687
Pros
- Reliable and predictable handling on dry pavement
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage lifespan
- Good light off-road performance on dirt, sand, and minor tracks
Cons
- Poor wet braking performance and grip at higher speeds
- Inadequate traction in deep snow, ice, mud, or wet grass
- Noticeable road noise as the tire wears
Tire B Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.
f150forum.com
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
r/TyreReviews
·1 upvote ·2023-03-21
“I just got the extreme at2 and they are awesome and quiet. Did go on an easy/moderate off-road in Broken Bow, OK and they did outstanding!”
r/f150
·1 upvote ·2024-03-23
“I had the Dynapro AT2’s on my Lightning and they’re ok. I’d say they’re excellent dry, ok wet and in mud, marginal in snow. When I was looking for new tires I wanted an All Terrain that was slightly more aggressive for off-road and Three-Peak snow rated. But, with the Lightning, they couldn’t be a heavy tire as it would hurt range. Ended up settling on the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. Essentially this is the newer version of the AT2. I’ve got about 10,000 miles on them so far and I’ll say dry handling is a little worse than the old AT2 (probably due to the more aggressive lugs), wet handling is about the same, but mud and snow handling is noticeably improved. So all in all, I probably wouldn’t get the AT2 again but I would do the AT2 Xtreme again.”
Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability
Based on 47 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 | B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 7 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 B A | 440 - 660 A A - B |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
55
/ 100
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
56
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Too close to call: Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 and Hankook Dynapro AT2 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro AT2 is stronger on wet. Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro AT2 scores 58 vs 55 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/T 687 or Dynapro AT2?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 687 or Dynapro AT2?
Hankook Dynapro AT2, 58 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 687 or Dynapro AT2?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 56 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 687 or Dynapro AT2?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 61 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 687 or Dynapro AT2?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 52 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 687 or Dynapro AT2?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 55 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology