Bridgestone Potenza RE070 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE070 vs Nitto Invo — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 38 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE070 leads, 66–62 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nitto Invo
Tire BNitto

Invo

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 38 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Potenza RE070 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7765

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74

    Invo: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Potenza RE070 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6260

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64

    Invo: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    Potenza RE070 +9
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5539

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61

    Invo: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 52

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Invo +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5462

    Potenza RE070: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 54.1 = 59

    Invo: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 61

    Noise

    Invo +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5277

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 61

    Invo: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 71

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE070 or Invo. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE070 +8
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070Invo
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6452

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Invo: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE070 +12
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070Invo
    Reviews found online7563
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE070 vs Nitto Invo: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE070Nitto Invo
Relative Score 66 62
Dry 74 66
Wet 64 63
Snow 61 52
Comfort 59 64
Noise 61 71
Treadwear 65 57
Handling (owners) 75 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE070

± 7

Invo

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE070

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip approaching track-day tire levels
  • Stiff sidewalls that drastically improve steering response and vehicle handling
  • Great value and affordability compared to other specialty sport tires

Cons

  • Poor performance and hydroplaning tendency in wet weather, standing water, or heavy rain
  • Harsh ride quality around town due to very stiff sidewalls
  • High levels of road noise at everyday speeds
All owner themes in the Potenza RE070 review

Tire B Invo

Pros

  • Exceptional initial ride comfort and smoothness
  • Very quiet and low road noise when new
  • Strong dry traction and cornering grip for spirited driving

Cons

  • Dramatically reduced wet and dry grip as the tire wears down
  • Rapid tread wear and limited overall longevity
  • Develops severe road noise, whining, or harsh vibrations over time
All owner themes in the Invo review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070 B · Nitto Invo
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—39
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″10.3/32″
UTQG140 A A220 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE070

Nitto Invo

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza RE070 — better handling, snow and dry. Pick the Nitto Invo if noise and comfort matter most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE070 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE070 scores 75 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nitto Invo scores 71 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Potenza RE070 scores 61 vs 52 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE070 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070
Tire B · Nitto Invo

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE070 or Invo?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE070 or Invo?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 63 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE070 or Invo?

Bridgestone Potenza RE070, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza RE070 or Invo?

Bridgestone Potenza RE070, 61 vs 52 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE070 or Invo?

Nitto Invo, 71 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE070 or Invo?

Nitto Invo, 64 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE070 or Invo?

Bridgestone Potenza RE070, 65 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology