Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,807 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 3 road tests and 5,807 + 4,983 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport All Season 4 is ahead, 79–63
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,807 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 81 · 4,983 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)
“I just switched from the Pilot Sport All Season 4 to the Continental DWS 06 Plus, and the contis are WAY quieter and ride so much smoother than the Michelins. Hopefully they'll last longer too, the Michelins only lasted me about 28k~ miles despite regularly rotating them.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests | 79 | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 89 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 60 = 72
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 89.2 = 83
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests | 86 | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 90 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 89.9 = 85
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 58 (est.) | 84 |
| Reviews found online | 38 | 65 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 50
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 65.4 = 77
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests | 63 | 69 |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 78 |
Potenza S001: 40% × 63.3 + 60% × 47.2 = 54
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 78.2 = 74
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests | 56 | 55 |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 80 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 55.9 = 56
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 55.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 65
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 58 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 43 | 72 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 58 + 40% × 42.8 = 52
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport All Season 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 60 | 83 |
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 41 | – |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 79 |
| Dry | 72 | 83 |
| Wet | 75 | 85 |
| Snow | 50 | 77 |
| Comfort | 54 | 74 |
| Noise | 56 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 83 |
| Efficiency | 41 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza S001
Pilot Sport All Season 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport All Season 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #7/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 88% #3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 78% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 94% #4/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 70% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 96% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #2/5 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.
“Thanks for the comments. I'm not sure a paltry $3m fine will move BMW to more or quicker recalls. It's just a drop in the bucket for them. In this case too, BMW has yet to accept any responsibility for the tire issues and has put it all on Goodyear for warranty and replacement. This is the sort of BS thing I am expecting to happen, although unlike the LS2's, I have been assured that there are no Excellence tires to be had anywhere. I just hope they do the right thing here. The latest issue of Roundel reviews the new F30 and they claim the new Bridgestone Potenza S001 uses "third generation run-flat technology", whatever that is, and say its a great tire. I called around though, and no tire dealers even have that tire in their system yet.”
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
“The SL received 4 early Christmas presents. Had to replace the original factory Bridgestone run flat tires due to age. Was advised by the Mercedes Benz service department to replace the 8 year old tires even though the car only has 875 (now 900) miles. Costco had them in stock and approximately 1 hour later I was on my way back home. They wouldn’t sell me anything but run flat tires, no spare tire etc., and this is the only run flat tire that they offer in 19 inch tire size. Hope this helps anyone else who needs to buy new tires for their SL. Happy Holidays, Mike”
Based on 43 community posts
Community sentiment for the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 is predominantly positive, with drivers praising its dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and substantial upgrade over stock tires. However, several users report drawbacks including mediocre deep snow performance, noticeable road noise or ride stiffness compared to competitors like the Continental DWS 06 Plus, and an efficiency or range penalty on electric vehicles.
“Michelin PSAS4 vs Conti DWS06+ Recently did a change-up, went from a set of Continental ExtremeContact DWS06 Plus (driven 17,000 miles / 27,360 kilometres) to a new set of Michelin Pilot Sport All-Season 4. I drive a VW GTI and live in Southern Oregon with a 75-mile (120-km) roundtrip commute everyday and here are my observations: the Michelins are a touch quieter and dare I say offer a more ‘refined’ ride the Contis felt stiffer (subjective) but has better cornering without a doubt. Ran both sets at 39 psi (269 kPa) for the 225/40-18 size. the Contis definitely brake better under cool rainy conditions (ambient temp was about 13°C) the Contis perform very, very well in snowy conditions but I’ve yet to test out the Michelins in the same environment. I drove the Continentals on more than 10,000 miles of snow just last winter. the Michelins quickly lose grip when I dump the clutch in first gear, compared to the Continentals. The ESC on my GTI turns on more often with the Michelins as well. the Michelins are ever so slightly more fuel efficient but only a 1-3 mpg difference at best, I found Overall, if you’re looking for a more performance-focused (and light snow-biased) UHPAS tire definitely go for the DWS06 Plus. As for me I’m delighted with the PSAS4 overall, but it’s also because I’m highly biased on Michelins as a brand. Read more”
“I just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport AS4 that I had on my Impreza with the Michelin CC2s. I got 30k out of the PSAS4 tires, and neither the tire shop nor Michelin would honor the 45k warranty, even with regular rotations and even wear. I was not impressed with them in the snow, and I've had about 30 winters of driving with different all seasons. The CC2, on the other hand, were incredible. Such a good tire in my first winter that I bought a set for my daughter's Forester. A little noisier than the PSAS4s, but I'll take superior handling on ice/snow over the quieter tire.”
“Replaced tires with Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, ride significantly improved My 2021 MYLR with 19" Gemini wheels ran over a screw in the tire sidewall and I had to replace the tire. I decided to replace all four tires since the tread was low anyway. I ended up replacing with the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4. I was happy to find that the ride quality significantly improved after this. Just wanted to let folks know. Others have pointed out that there's a slight range efficiency hit and the tires don't reach all the way to the Gemini rims like the stock Continentals do. I find I don't care about these things and enjoy the ride quality improvement a lot. If I put the car in Chill mode now and drive others around, it's a much better ride experience for them on residential streets. The tires were a bit expensive, $1700 to replace all four including labor (in the SF Bay, a HCOL area) but I had to replace the tires anyway and the benefits were worth it to me.”
Based on 241 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 55 | 3 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 20″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 440 - 540 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 — better snow, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 77 vs 50 on snow.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 83 vs 60 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 74 vs 54 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 70 vs 52 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 85 vs 75 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 83 vs 72 on our dry score.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 77 vs 50 on our snow score.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 65 vs 56 on our noise score.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 74 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 70 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology