Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 3 road tests and 5,807 + 4,983 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport All Season 4 is ahead, 79–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Potenza S001

Summer

± 7

Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,807 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
± 5

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 81 · 4,983 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)

“I just switched from the Pilot Sport All Season 4 to the Continental DWS 06 Plus, and the contis are WAY quieter and ride so much smoother than the Michelins. Hopefully they'll last longer too, the Michelins only lasted me about 28k~ miles despite regularly rotating them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +11
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests7978
    Reviews found online6089

    Potenza S001: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 60 = 72

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 89.2 = 83

  2. 75

    Wet

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +10
    85
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 3 tests8681
    Reviews found online6090

    Potenza S001: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 89.9 = 85

  3. 50

    Snow

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +27
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 58 (est.)84
    Reviews found online3865

    Potenza S001: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 50

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 65.4 = 77

    No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +20
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests6369
    Reviews found online4778

    Potenza S001: 40% × 63.3 + 60% × 47.2 = 54

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 78.2 = 74

  5. 56

    Noise

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests5655
    Reviews found online5680

    Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 55.9 = 56

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 55.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 65

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +18
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests58≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4372

    Potenza S001: 60% × 58 + 40% × 42.8 = 52

    Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport All Season 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 60

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport All Season 4 +23
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Reviews found online6083
  8. 41

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests41–
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza S001Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
Relative Score 63 79
Dry 72 83
Wet 75 85
Snow 50 77
Comfort 54 74
Noise 56 65
Treadwear 52 70
Handling (owners) 60 83
Efficiency 41 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Potenza S001

± 5

Pilot Sport All Season 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPotenza S001Pilot Sport All Season 4ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #7/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #2/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 88% #3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 98% #5/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 78% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 94% #4/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 70% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 96% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 98% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires #2/5 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza S001

Pros

  • Precise and sharp steering response
  • Strong dry-pavement cornering grip
  • Stiff sidewalls providing robust rim protection and high-speed stability

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality (particularly noticeable on run-flat versions)
  • Poor or unpredictable wet-weather grip and sudden loss of traction
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 review

Tire B Pilot Sport All Season 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip with strong hydroplaning resistance
  • Precise steering response and sporty handling feel
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and composure over OEM run-flats

Cons

  • Faster-than-advertised treadwear, particularly on performance vehicles or staggered setups
  • Elevated road noise or humming/roaring sounds at highway speeds
  • Premium price point ('Michelin Tax')
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport All Season 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.

bimmerfest.com ·2012-02-16

“Thanks for the comments. I'm not sure a paltry $3m fine will move BMW to more or quicker recalls. It's just a drop in the bucket for them. In this case too, BMW has yet to accept any responsibility for the tire issues and has put it all on Goodyear for warranty and replacement. This is the sort of BS thing I am expecting to happen, although unlike the LS2's, I have been assured that there are no Excellence tires to be had anywhere. I just hope they do the right thing here. The latest issue of Roundel reviews the new F30 and they claim the new Bridgestone Potenza S001 uses "third generation run-flat technology", whatever that is, and say its a great tire. I called around though, and no tire dealers even have that tire in their system yet.”

svtperformance.com ·2 upvotes ·2023-08-06

“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”

mbworld.org

“The SL received 4 early Christmas presents. Had to replace the original factory Bridgestone run flat tires due to age. Was advised by the Mercedes Benz service department to replace the 8 year old tires even though the car only has 875 (now 900) miles. Costco had them in stock and approximately 1 hour later I was on my way back home. They wouldn’t sell me anything but run flat tires, no spare tire etc., and this is the only run flat tire that they offer in 19 inch tire size. Hope this helps anyone else who needs to buy new tires for their SL. Happy Holidays, Mike”

Top themes
#run-flat stiffness and harshness#premature tread wear#tread cracking issues#wet and dry grip#switching to non-run-flats#road noise generation#OEM tire replacement

Based on 43 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 is predominantly positive, with drivers praising its dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and substantial upgrade over stock tires. However, several users report drawbacks including mediocre deep snow performance, noticeable road noise or ride stiffness compared to competitors like the Continental DWS 06 Plus, and an efficiency or range penalty on electric vehicles.

r/tires ·8 upvotes ·2023-09-29

“Michelin PSAS4 vs Conti DWS06+ Recently did a change-up, went from a set of Continental ExtremeContact DWS06 Plus (driven 17,000 miles / 27,360 kilometres) to a new set of Michelin Pilot Sport All-Season 4. I drive a VW GTI and live in Southern Oregon with a 75-mile (120-km) roundtrip commute everyday and here are my observations: the Michelins are a touch quieter and dare I say offer a more ‘refined’ ride the Contis felt stiffer (subjective) but has better cornering without a doubt. Ran both sets at 39 psi (269 kPa) for the 225/40-18 size. the Contis definitely brake better under cool rainy conditions (ambient temp was about 13°C) the Contis perform very, very well in snowy conditions but I’ve yet to test out the Michelins in the same environment. I drove the Continentals on more than 10,000 miles of snow just last winter. the Michelins quickly lose grip when I dump the clutch in first gear, compared to the Continentals. The ESC on my GTI turns on more often with the Michelins as well. the Michelins are ever so slightly more fuel efficient but only a 1-3 mpg difference at best, I found Overall, if you’re looking for a more performance-focused (and light snow-biased) UHPAS tire definitely go for the DWS06 Plus. As for me I’m delighted with the PSAS4 overall, but it’s also because I’m highly biased on Michelins as a brand. Read more”

impreza5.com ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-06

“I just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport AS4 that I had on my Impreza with the Michelin CC2s. I got 30k out of the PSAS4 tires, and neither the tire shop nor Michelin would honor the 45k warranty, even with regular rotations and even wear. I was not impressed with them in the snow, and I've had about 30 winters of driving with different all seasons. The CC2, on the other hand, were incredible. Such a good tire in my first winter that I bought a set for my daughter's Forester. A little noisier than the PSAS4s, but I'll take superior handling on ice/snow over the quieter tire.”

r/TeslaModelY ·52 upvotes ·2023-02-26

“Replaced tires with Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, ride significantly improved My 2021 MYLR with 19" Gemini wheels ran over a screw in the tire sidewall and I had to replace the tire. I decided to replace all four tires since the tread was low anyway. I ended up replacing with the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4. I was happy to find that the ride quality significantly improved after this. Just wanted to let folks know. Others have pointed out that there's a slight range efficiency hit and the tires don't reach all the way to the Gemini rims like the stock Continentals do. I find I don't care about these things and enjoy the ride quality improvement a lot. If I put the car in Chill mode now and drive others around, it's a much better ride experience for them on residential streets. The tires were a bit expensive, $1700 to replace all four including labor (in the SF Bay, a HCOL area) but I had to replace the tires anyway and the benefits were worth it to me.”

Top themes
#wet and dry grip#winter and snow capability#EV efficiency and range#Continental DWS06 Plus comparison#CrossClimate 2 comparison#road noise and ride comfort#tread life and wear

Based on 241 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 B · Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available553
Rim diameters15″ – 21″20″
Tread depth8/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG280 A A440 - 540 A - AA A
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 — better snow, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 77 vs 50 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 83 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 74 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 70 vs 52 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza S001 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza S001 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 85 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S001 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 83 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza S001 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 77 vs 50 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Potenza S001 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 65 vs 56 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza S001 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 74 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza S001 or Pilot Sport All Season 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 70 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology