tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza S007 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 20 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 65–54

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701 or Potenza S007 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +18
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S007ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 60 (est.)78
    Reviews found online5068

    Potenza S007: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.5 = 56

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Potenza S007. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 57

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +10
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S007ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 60 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5264

    Potenza S007: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Potenza S007. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 56

    Snow

    Potenza S007 +20
    36
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S007ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online4612

    Potenza S007: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.3 = 36

    No road tests of snow for Potenza S007. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 46

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +16
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S007ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 62 (est.)62
    Reviews found online3561

    Potenza S007: 40% × 62 (est.) + 60% × 35.3 = 46

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza S007. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 59

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S007ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)75
    Reviews found online4760

    Potenza S007: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Potenza S007. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 45

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +24
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S007ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 54 (est.)75
    Reviews found online3159

    Potenza S007: 60% × 53.6 (est.) + 40% × 30.9 = 45

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S007. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +23
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S007ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online4972
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S007ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza S007Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 54 65
Dry 56 74
Wet 57 67
Snow 56 36
Comfort 46 62
Noise 59 69
Treadwear 45 69
Handling (owners) 49 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza S007

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza S007

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and traction under heavy acceleration and high horsepower
  • Precise handling and cornering stability in warm weather
  • Suitable for occasional track use and aggressive driving

Cons

  • Poor wet weather performance, with multiple reports of severe aquaplaning and lack of confidence on damp roads
  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with some users experiencing wear out in under 10,000 miles
  • Stiff ride quality and noticeable road noise on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Potenza S007 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza S007

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza S007 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1470
Rim diameters17″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG240 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza S007

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S007 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Potenza S007 scores 56 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 56 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S007
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza S007 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza S007 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 67 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S007 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza S007 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Bridgestone Potenza S007, 56 vs 36 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Potenza S007 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza S007 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 62 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza S007 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 45 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology