Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza S007A vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 11 + 497 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Potenza S007A 69, ADVAN Sport V105 70.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 497 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Tread Life on the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
ADVAN Sport V105 +473Why this score
Source Potenza S007A ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 69 74 Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 73.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
ADVAN Sport V105 +472Why this score
Source Potenza S007A ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 67 72 Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72 + 40% × 72.4 = 72
No road tests of wet for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison60Why this score
Source Potenza S007A ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online – 54 ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
ADVAN Sport V105 +167Why this score
Source Potenza S007A ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 64 66 Potenza S007A: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 64.2 = 66
ADVAN Sport V105: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S007A or ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison59Why this score
Source Potenza S007A ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 53 Reviews found online – 67 ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 53.1 + 40% × 67.3 = 59
-
68
Treadwear
Potenza S007A +266Why this score
Source Potenza S007A ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 70 Reviews found online 64 61 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 62% 62% Potenza S007A: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 64.3 = 68
ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66
-
76
Handling (owners)
Potenza S007A +472Why this score
Source Potenza S007A ADVAN Sport V105 Reviews found online 76 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison59Why this score
Source Potenza S007A ADVAN Sport V105 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S007A | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 70 |
| Dry | 69 | 73 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 66 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 59 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Potenza S007A
70
/ 100
ADVAN Sport V105
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Potenza S007A finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S007A | ADVAN Sport V105 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% | 62% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/22 | #16/22 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza S007A
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and high-speed cornering stability
- Stiff sidewalls providing precise steering response and excellent feedback
- Strong track-day performance with improved lap times compared to predecessor models
Cons
- Subpar wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance, especially when pushed
- Poor performance and sliding tendencies in colder temperatures
- Fast tread wear under aggressive driving conditions
Tire B ADVAN Sport V105
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
- Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
- Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
- Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
- Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Potenza S007A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Community discussions reflect mixed impressions regarding the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, highlighting both praise for its wet and dry handling along with debates surrounding its tread life. While some drivers report surprisingly durable treadwear and good overall value, others cite reports of poor tread life and note that ride comfort and road noise may trail competitor offerings.
northamericanmotoring.com
“Advan Sport V105 does get a good tirerack review: Comes in 205/55-16 (three models. Mercedes W and V speed rated and 2010 Production) $83-86 each Not as comfortable or quiet as other Max Summer tires but handles well in both dry and wet. If you prefer to keep the 205/50-16 tire size then for street use and daily driving with a slightly higher budget: Michelin Premier A/S Grand Touring All Season $132 each 640 treadwear, V speed rated, 19 lbs. Tirerack test result- Good blend of comfort and handling with much longer treadlife.”
r/WRX
·1 upvote ·2020-03-08
“I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Top themes
#tread life longevity#dry and wet handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and noise#OEM fitment evaluation#daily driving performance
Based on 7 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 144 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 20″ | 16″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza S007A
70
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza S007A and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 is stronger on dry and wet. Bridgestone Potenza S007A rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza S007A or ADVAN Sport V105?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza S007A or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S007A or ADVAN Sport V105?
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza S007A or ADVAN Sport V105?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Potenza S007A or ADVAN Sport V105?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology