Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 0 road tests and 724 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza Sport is ahead, 75–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Potenza Sport

Summer

± 4

Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 724 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)

“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 88

    Dry

    Potenza Sport +25
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza SportEagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests96≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7560

    Potenza Sport: 60% × 96 + 40% × 74.8 = 88

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 86

    Wet

    Potenza Sport +27
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza SportEagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests95≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7355

    Potenza Sport: 60% × 95.4 + 40% × 72.6 = 86

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza SportEagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–50

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Potenza Sport +2
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza SportEagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests55≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6252

    Potenza Sport: 40% × 54.7 + 60% × 61.9 = 59

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 43

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season +22
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza SportEagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests30≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6363

    Potenza Sport: 60% × 30 + 40% × 63.3 = 43

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    No road tests of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 59

    Treadwear

    Potenza Sport +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza SportEagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests71≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4048

    Potenza Sport: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 39.5 = 59

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza Sport +21
    53
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza SportEagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
    Reviews found online7453
  8. 12

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza SportEagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests12–
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza SportGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
Relative Score 75 59
Dry 88 63
Wet 86 59
Snow – 58
Comfort 59 57
Noise 43 65
Treadwear 59 55
Handling (owners) 74 53
Efficiency 12 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Potenza Sport

± 8

Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza Sport

Pros

  • Outstanding dry and wet grip
  • Precise, telepathic steering response and feedback
  • Excellent braking performance

Cons

  • Fast tread wear and short lifespan
  • High road noise
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality over bumps
All owner themes in the Potenza Sport review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality with minimal road noise
  • Reliable traction on dry and wet surfaces
  • Competent performance in light snow and winter conditions

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by certain users, especially on the shoulders
  • Shorter overall lifespan compared to some original equipment tire alternatives
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Mixed

The community praises the Bridgestone Potenza Sport for its exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, and value pricing compared to competitors. However, users frequently highlight drawbacks such as fast tread wear and poor durability when used for track days, along with some complaints regarding lower fuel economy and narrower physical dimensions.

r/TyreReviews ·61 upvotes ·2026-04-09

“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo - quick initial review - 250 miles Very early impression on this newly released update, used as a track tyre on my modded MX-5 done about 50 laps at Bedford Autodrome GT layout, 8-15C air temp, as well as to and from the track. Fun track tyres, great handling feedback and direct steering feel, plenty of grip when push and stable through corner. Confident under heavy braking. Track performance much improved overall compared to the PS4 previously which was quite snappy at limit. Not driven in the wet yet so cannot comment on wet performance. Not driven enough to comment on wear but seems decent after 50 laps/250 miles Road noise is louder, and side wall is stiffer compared to PS4, maybe by ~10%. Would recommend, especially if you can get them on a deal. I paid £330 for 4 corners fitted. Size was 225/45/17. The side wall is quite pretty too if you care for this. Read more”

rennlist.com

“Due to rain later in the week I’ve only been able to put ~50 miles on them. Other tires I’ve run are the Bridgestone S02 and S03. I preferred the S02’s over the S03. PS4’s, PS Cup’s and Hankook V12’s. And Hoosier R6 at track. So far, the New Potenza Sports are outstanding. Low road noise, fantastic dry traction, turn in and braking. No wet experience yet, and hopefully never as I don’t typically drive this car in the rain. I’m going to play around with tire pressure, so if anyone has any recommendations for 997 C2 I’d love to hear.”

forum.miata.net

“I used 2 sets of 4 Potenza Sport on my daily in 225/45r17, excellent tires I don't think it can be beaten in terms of feeling (the Sport Contact 7 seems very good too but not tested), rigid sidewalls, progressive, very very easy to drive, fast even in the wet. Yes very soft rubber not for track but on the other hand in the wet close to 0°C it's incredible, much better than mid-range 4 seasons. On the rear axle (FWD daily) I did several winters with snowy days and -5/-10°C, the following year and even worn to 100% there is only aquaplaning that it can fear (be careful I didn't say it was good on snow lol, with its continuous rubber bands it's a disaster.).”

Top themes
#Steering response and feel#Dry and wet grip#Tread wear and longevity#Track performance limitations#Price and value

Based on 93 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
CategorySummerUltra High Performance All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1281
Rim diameters16″ – 24″20″
Tread depth7 - 10/32″—
UTQG200 - 320 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Sport — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season if noise matters most to you. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza Sport scores 86 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza Sport scores 88 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season scores 65 vs 43 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza Sport scores 74 vs 53 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza Sport or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza Sport or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?

Bridgestone Potenza Sport, 86 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza Sport or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?

Bridgestone Potenza Sport, 88 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Potenza Sport or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season, 65 vs 43 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza Sport or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 57 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Potenza Sport or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?

Bridgestone Potenza Sport, 59 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology