Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 199 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 37 road tests and 199 + 10,323 owner reviews. How we score
Turanza T005 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 37 tests Owners 62 · 10,323 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Are these needing replacement? - Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT (Run Flat) BMW G20 Not sure if I should be replacing these yet they seem close to the wear bar, rather be safe than sorry and to ask here especially with Uk/Irish weather 😅 Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Turanza T005 +876Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Turanza T005 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 34 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 68 63 Turanza ER300: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
Turanza T005: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 62.9 = 76
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Turanza T005 +979Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Turanza T005 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 35 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 70 70 Turanza ER300: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
Turanza T005: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 69.8 = 79
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Turanza T005 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Level65Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Turanza T005 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 63 61 Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 65
Turanza T005: 40% × 72.6 + 60% × 60.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Turanza ER300 +2048Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Turanza T005 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 36 Reviews found online 71 ≈ 67 (est.) Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
Turanza T005: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 48
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Turanza T005. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +464Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Turanza T005 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 70 52 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68
Turanza T005: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 52.2 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Turanza ER300 +164Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Turanza T005 Reviews found online 65 64 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison100Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Turanza T005 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests – 100
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Bridgestone Turanza T005 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 71 |
| Dry | 68 | 76 |
| Wet | 70 | 79 |
| Snow | 66 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 65 |
| Noise | 68 | 48 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 64 |
| Efficiency | – | 100 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Turanza ER300
Turanza T005
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza ER300 | Turanza T005 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | #5/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B Turanza T005
Pros
- Exceptional wet grip and short braking distances in rain
- Improved fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Confident, stable handling at highway speeds
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear and shorter overall lifespan reported by many users
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and lack of precision during spirited cornering
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking over time
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided, with many drivers praising its wet-weather grip and highway usability. Conversely, numerous owners report significant concerns regarding loud road noise, rough ride comfort, rapid wear, and premature sidewall cracking or dry rot.
“Turanza T005 Hello, I bought a Seat Leon Cupra equipped with BRIDGESTONE TURANZA T005 XL in 225/40/18 92Y. I join you the card of the tire in attachment. It is the manufacturer model 13011. On the BRIDGESTONE website, there is a PDF with the list of all TURANZA models that I attach to this post. You can find the characteristics of the model 13011. Only here is one of my tires is damaged, and I would like to change it by the same model. First of all I can't find it on the online retailers. In fact, I can find references that look exactly the same. But there are some extra words that I don't understand. The abbreviations WAR/REP in the Trade Category column mean what exactly? I found the reference 8836 (or 13187) for example which corresponds in all points but the abbreviation REP is affixed in addition on the PDF. Please help me to find this information.”
“For more detailed information and a projection of the consumption advantage based on an example: Below is the link to the EU regulation on tire labeling and the information from the Michelin homepage for comparison with other efficient tires: ... 0740&rid=1 Group C1 is listed in the regulation as: A: <=6.5 kg/t B: 6.7 to 7.7 kg/t C: 7.8 to 9 kg/t The Bridgestone EP500 is in class B Use the following formula to calculate the consumption advantage: F_ROLL:g*M*CR = rolling resistance in J/m For kWh/100km: F_Rolll*100000/3600 Example based on my 120ah REX Bridgestone EP500/Turanza T005 (7.17 kg/t and 5.81 kg/t respectively) 9.81*1465*0.00717=103.0 J/m = 2.86 kWh/100km 9.81*1465*0.00581=83.5 J/m = 2.32 kWh/100km Michelin e Primacy (5.58 kg/t and 5.13 kg/t respectively) 9.81*1465*0.00558=83.4 J/m = 2.32 kWh/100km 9.81*1465*0.00513=73.7 J/m = 2.05 kWh/100km Reduction of 0.55 kWh/100km for new tires Reduction of 0.27 kWh/100km for worn tires For me, that was reason enough to choose this one”
“Only issue is possible ride quality with higher pressure. Dealer and independents seem to universally recommend going higher on tire pressures to maximize tire life for even wear on BMWs. I have been lectured on it a couple times at a locally respected suspension/alignment specialist over the years.”
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Bridgestone Turanza T005 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 140 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 14″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Sizes in common | 19 | 19 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better wet and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza ER300 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 48 on noise.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 79 vs 70 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 76 vs 68 on dry.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 64 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 or Turanza T005?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or Turanza T005?
Bridgestone Turanza T005, 79 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or Turanza T005?
Bridgestone Turanza T005, 76 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Turanza ER300 or Turanza T005?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 48 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or Turanza T005?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or Turanza T005?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology