Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 199 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 199 + 561 owner reviews. How we score
Turanza ER300 is ahead, 68–57
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 561 reviews
“CrossContact LX Sport Hey folks, I have a 2024 CRV with 4 CrossContact LX Sport tires from the dealership. I have less than 9500 miles om my vehicle/tires but it appears I have a slight hole on the sidewall. If I place my finger on it the air stops coming out. I ordered a set of CrossClimate2s from Costco knowing that AWD vehicles need to match all 4 generally speaking to prevent issues with the drive train, but after my father member looked at it he insisted that I just need to slap a replacement on the single tire given theyre so new. Tldr: is it worth to buy a new set of CrossClimate2s or should I just get a single CrossContact and have tire rack match the tread depth? Kinda don't wanna be out $1400 but also went with my gut on it given i dont wanna f up my drive train on my vehicle and the CrossContacts according to reviews have high failure rates even at low mileage. Please let me know.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Turanza ER300 +959Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 68 55 Turanza ER300: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Turanza ER300 +961Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 70 57 Turanza ER300: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Turanza ER300 +462Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 63 57 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 62
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Turanza ER300 +362Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 58 Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 65
CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Turanza ER300 +464Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 71 61 Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 64
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +2840Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 51 (est.) Reviews found online 70 23 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 22.6 = 40
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Turanza ER300 +1946Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 65 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 57 |
| Dry | 68 | 59 |
| Wet | 70 | 61 |
| Snow | 66 | 62 |
| Comfort | 65 | 62 |
| Noise | 68 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 40 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Turanza ER300
57
/ 100
CrossContact LX Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community opinion on the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with some drivers praising its comfort, balance of control, and low road noise. However, many owners express dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, flaking or chunking, poor wet traction, and shallow initial tread depth. Several users consider replacing them early with options like Michelin CrossClimate or Defender models.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2022-08-25
“Trav- someone I know has these and likes them, good experience so far. When I look on TR, DT it does not show the 235-55-20 as an option. Maybe just current supply issues? I tried the Toyo website directly and it doesn't list them as being an option either. The Celsius Sport, yes, but not the Celsius CUV? The Walmart link doesn't have a purchase option for me just "show nearby availability" but none show. Your thoughts on the Celsius "Sport" if he was looking at that? My experience was with Continental CrossContact LX Sport and Bridgestone Dueler H/P Sport AS. They were both good dry and wet, wore out fast, total safety hazards in the snow, like plastic sled or saucer on a snowy hill bad. For me if winter/snow is a possibility and need reliable traction, anything tire that says sport is not.”
r/crv
·3 upvotes ·2026-04-30
“2024 EXL Tire Review - Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/60/18 Replaced the oem tires with only 10,000 miles with these after reading reviews and the price point. Very happy with them, better handling and feel with less road noise and much better on grooved pavement. The oem Bridgestones wandered badly on grooved pavement. Highly recommended. Read more”
mbworld.org
“It’s a compromise between ‘comfort’ ride and safety and handling. Advance driving course will add around 8psi cold. I find on any rim size additional 4psi makes a difference. Why ? Under heavy braking the tyre collapsed in the middle, by running higher inflation the complete width of the type is on the road, better braking efficiency - if under inflated only the outer edges keep in contact with the ground, causing less efficiency and longer distance to stop. Higher inflation also ensures tyre does not warp and twist on rim when turning. Too much inflation is just as bad, only the middle touches road - less braking efficiency and wear out tyre quicker. OEM recommended pressure is for comfort and sometimes sees increased edge wear over life of tyre. Regular tyre rotation and wheel balance and alignment will maximise tyre life. Try for yourself, But I have found around 4psi extra when cold is optimum.”
Top themes
#premature tread wear#wet weather traction#OEM tire replacement#tire inflation pressure#ride comfort and road noise#EV efficiency comparison
Based on 26 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 23 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 480 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
57
/ 100
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 40 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 70 vs 61 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 70 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 66 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or CrossContact LX Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 40 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology