Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 199 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Continental SportContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 12 road tests and 199 + 669 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Turanza ER300 68, SportContact 6 67.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 12 tests Owners 53 · 669 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“70k on SC6 ? Mine lasted 17k and now since I have the SC7 they overpassed the 6 without problems. They are better.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
SportContact 6 +1583Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 89 Reviews found online 68 73 Turanza ER300: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
SportContact 6: 60% × 89.4 + 40% × 72.9 = 83
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
SportContact 6 +1181Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 70 70 Turanza ER300: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
SportContact 6: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 69.5 = 81
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Turanza ER300 +3036Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online 63 15 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
SportContact 6: 60% × 49.8 (est.) + 40% × 14.6 = 36
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for SportContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Level65Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 63 61 Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 65
SportContact 6: 40% × 72.4 + 60% × 60.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
SportContact 6 +472Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 71 70 Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
SportContact 6: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 70.4 = 72
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +2642Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 70 27 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68
SportContact 6: 60% × 52.6 (est.) + 40% × 27.3 = 42
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for SportContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
65
Handling (owners)
SportContact 6 +267Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 SportContact 6 Reviews found online 65 67 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison69Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests – 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Continental SportContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 67 |
| Dry | 68 | 83 |
| Wet | 70 | 81 |
| Snow | 66 | 36 |
| Comfort | 65 | 65 |
| Noise | 68 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 42 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 67 |
| Efficiency | – | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Turanza ER300
67
/ 100
SportContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza ER300 | SportContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | #4/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B SportContact 6
Pros
- Staggering grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Precise steering feedback and sharp cornering response
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort compared to some rivals
Cons
- Rapid tread wear leading to a short lifespan (often requiring replacement under 10,000-15,000 miles)
- Reduced performance and potential snap oversteer in cold or freezing weather conditions
- High cost per mile due to fast wear rates
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Continental SportContact 6
Community members generally praise the Continental Sport Contact 6 for its strong grip, smooth handling, and impressive wet performance. However, high tread wear is a frequent and significant complaint, with many drivers reporting poor longevity compared to successors like the SportContact 7 and competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S. Additional mixed feedback notes issues such as road noise, ride stiffness, and occasional sidewall flex during aggressive cornering.
rennlist.com
“Hi! My 2013 Carrera S came on N-marked Pirelli P Zeros back in 2019 when i bought it. Replaced them with SportContact 6 after one year - big, positive difference! When the SC6:s were worn out i replaced them with SC7:S, also great with lovely handling and better wet grip. Perhaps a little softer sidewall on the SC tyres compared to P0? SC7 seems to wear less quickly than SC6. Have not used them in cold weather, but don't expect any summer tire to work well during winter conditions.”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2018-05-16
“The only tires that'll be better in the wet than the ones you listed are SOME top-of-the-line summer tires, particularly the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S and Continental SportContact 6. The way those tires perform in the rain will bend your mind. But you seem to want to be able to drive the same tire year-round, so those are out. If you want an all-season tire and your biggest priority is wet performance, you probably want the RE980AS. When you hydroplaned, which axle let go? Front, back, or both? All tires inflated to spec, etc.? How fast were you going?”
r/TyreReviews
·5 upvotes ·2026-05-12
“70k on SC6 ? Mine lasted 17k and now since I have the SC7 they overpassed the 6 without problems. They are better.”
Top themes
#rapid tread wear#strong wet performance#dry grip and handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#longevity versus SportContact 7#road noise and comfort#cornering and sidewall stiffness
Based on 27 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Continental SportContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 97 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 18″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
67
/ 100
Continental SportContact 6
Too close to call: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 and Continental SportContact 6 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Turanza ER300 is stronger on snow and treadwear. Continental SportContact 6 is stronger on dry, wet and noise.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 66 vs 36 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 42 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental SportContact 6 scores 83 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental SportContact 6 scores 81 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Tire B · Continental SportContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 or SportContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or SportContact 6?
Continental SportContact 6, 81 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or SportContact 6?
Continental SportContact 6, 83 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Turanza ER300 or SportContact 6?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 66 vs 36 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Turanza ER300 or SportContact 6?
Continental SportContact 6, 72 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or SportContact 6?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or SportContact 6?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 42 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology