Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 199 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 199 + 46 owner reviews. How we score
Turanza ER300 is ahead, 68–53
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 46 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Turanza ER300 +1355Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 ADVAN Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 68 48 Turanza ER300: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
ADVAN Sport: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 55
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Turanza ER300 +1258Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 ADVAN Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 70 54 Turanza ER300: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
ADVAN Sport: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 58
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Turanza ER300 +660Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 ADVAN Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 63 53 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
ADVAN Sport: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 60
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Turanza ER300 +2045Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 ADVAN Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 63 34 Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 65
ADVAN Sport: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 33.9 = 45
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Turanza ER300 +761Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 ADVAN Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 70 52 Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 68
ADVAN Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +2741Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 ADVAN Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 69 25 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 68
ADVAN Sport: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 24.9 = 41
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Turanza ER300 +2045Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 ADVAN Sport Reviews found online 65 45
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 53 |
| Dry | 68 | 55 |
| Wet | 70 | 58 |
| Snow | 66 | 60 |
| Comfort | 65 | 45 |
| Noise | 68 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 41 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza ER300
ADVAN Sport
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza ER300 | ADVAN Sport | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | #26/44 2012 Autobild 50 Tyre Braking Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B ADVAN Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling performance
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
- Predictable behavior when pushed near the limit
Cons
- Unacceptably high and intrusive road noise
- Very rapid tread wear with many reporting early replacement under 10,000 miles
- Stiff, harsh ride quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 3 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 19″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Yokohama ADVAN Sport
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 41 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 45 on comfort.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 45 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 70 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 66 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 65 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or ADVAN Sport?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 41 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology