Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 199 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 70–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +269Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 67 70 -
69
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +372Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 69 73 -
65
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 62 – -
66
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +672Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 63 74 -
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 70 – -
66
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +165Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 67 65 -
65
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +873Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 65 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 70 |
| Dry | 67 | 69 |
| Wet | 69 | 72 |
| Snow | 65 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 72 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 65 |
| Handling | 65 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Turanza ER300
BluEarth Es ES32
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 65 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.