Tests 71 · 3 tests Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 7 + 213 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Turanza T001 Evo 74, Ventus S1 evo 3 ev 73.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 3 tests Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 213 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Ventus S1 evo 3 ev |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 68 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 75 |
Turanza T001 Evo: 60% × 68.1 + 40% × 74.2 = 71
Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73
No road tests of dry for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Ventus S1 evo 3 ev |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 81 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 74 |
Turanza T001 Evo: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 77.4 = 80
Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73
No road tests of wet for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Ventus S1 evo 3 ev |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 69 |
Turanza T001 Evo: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 71.9 = 71
Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.3 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Turanza T001 Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Ventus S1 evo 3 ev |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 65 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 75 |
Turanza T001 Evo: 60% × 65 + 40% × 69.5 = 67
Ventus S1 evo 3 ev: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo 3 ev. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Ventus S1 evo 3 ev |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 76 | 74 |
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo | Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 73 |
| Dry | 71 | 73 |
| Wet | 80 | 73 |
| Comfort | 71 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza T001 Evo
Ventus S1 evo 3 ev
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 12 | 25 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 - 380 A A |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev
Too close to call: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo and Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo is stronger on wet. Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev is stronger on treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 80 vs 73 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev scores 72 vs 67 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo, 80 vs 73 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 ev, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology