Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 37 + 0 road tests and 10,323 + 143 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Turanza T005 73, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 74.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 37 tests Owners 62 · 10,323 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Are these needing replacement? - Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT (Run Flat) BMW G20 Not sure if I should be replacing these yet they seem close to the wear bar, rather be safe than sorry and to ask here especially with Uk/Irish weather 😅 Read more”
Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 143 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Turanza T005 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 34 / – tests | 85 | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 81 |
Turanza T005: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 62.9 = 76
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.5 = 76
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Turanza T005 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 35 / – tests | 86 | ≈ 77 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 82 |
Turanza T005: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 69.8 = 79
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 77.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 79
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Turanza T005 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 72 |
Turanza T005: 40% × 72.6 + 60% × 60.5 = 65
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.4 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Turanza T005 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / – tests | 36 | – |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
Turanza T005: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 48
No owner ratings of noise for Turanza T005. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Turanza T005 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 52 | 62 |
Turanza T005: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 52.2 = 64
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Turanza T005 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 64 | 74 |
| Source | Turanza T005 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / – tests | 100 | – |
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 74 |
| Dry | 76 | 76 |
| Wet | 79 | 79 |
| Comfort | 65 | 71 |
| Noise | 48 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 74 |
| Efficiency | 100 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Turanza T005
Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza T005 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | #2/8 2012 Auto Bild 20 inch Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided, with many drivers praising its wet-weather grip and highway usability. Conversely, numerous owners report significant concerns regarding loud road noise, rough ride comfort, rapid wear, and premature sidewall cracking or dry rot.
“You might like the Pirelli Cinturato P7 The Goodyears are sold out on both Amazon and Walmart but could come back in stock I found some other good options: Dunlop SP Sport 01 Gislaved Ultra Speed (Gislaved is now owned by Continental, more klnown for their winter tires but also make summer tires) Unfortunately, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Michelin Primacy 3 are too expensive”
“For more detailed information and a projection of the consumption advantage based on an example: Below is the link to the EU regulation on tire labeling and the information from the Michelin homepage for comparison with other efficient tires: ... 0740&rid=1 Group C1 is listed in the regulation as: A: <=6.5 kg/t B: 6.7 to 7.7 kg/t C: 7.8 to 9 kg/t The Bridgestone EP500 is in class B Use the following formula to calculate the consumption advantage: F_ROLL:g*M*CR = rolling resistance in J/m For kWh/100km: F_Rolll*100000/3600 Example based on my 120ah REX Bridgestone EP500/Turanza T005 (7.17 kg/t and 5.81 kg/t respectively) 9.81*1465*0.00717=103.0 J/m = 2.86 kWh/100km 9.81*1465*0.00581=83.5 J/m = 2.32 kWh/100km Michelin e Primacy (5.58 kg/t and 5.13 kg/t respectively) 9.81*1465*0.00558=83.4 J/m = 2.32 kWh/100km 9.81*1465*0.00513=73.7 J/m = 2.05 kWh/100km Reduction of 0.55 kWh/100km for new tires Reduction of 0.27 kWh/100km for worn tires For me, that was reason enough to choose this one”
“Only issue is possible ride quality with higher pressure. Dealer and independents seem to universally recommend going higher on tire pressures to maximize tire life for even wear on BMWs. I have been lectured on it a couple times at a locally respected suspension/alignment specialist over the years.”
Based on 33 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 140 | 11 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 22″ | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 A A | 240 - 300 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Too close to call: Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric is stronger on handling and comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 79 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
