Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Falken SN828 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Falken SN828 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 54 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
ComfortContact CC6 is ahead, 65–52
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
ComfortContact CC6 +757Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 62 52 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64
SN828: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
ComfortContact CC6 +1352Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 63 46 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 65
SN828: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 52
No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
ComfortContact CC6 +1557Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 73 51 ComfortContact CC6: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 72.8 = 72
SN828: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 51 = 57
No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6 or SN828. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
ComfortContact CC6 +1748Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 65 37 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 65
SN828: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48
No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
63
Handling (owners)
ComfortContact CC6 +2538Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 SN828 Reviews found online 63 38
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Falken SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 52 |
| Dry | 64 | 57 |
| Wet | 65 | 52 |
| Comfort | 72 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 48 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 38 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
ComfortContact CC6
52
/ 100
SN828
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B SN828
Pros
- High value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry weather traction
- Comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
- Subpar tread life and durability
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Falken SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental ComfortContact CC6
52
/ 100
Falken SN828
Winner: Continental ComfortContact CC6 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken SN828 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 63 vs 38 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 65 vs 48 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 72 vs 57 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 65 vs 52 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Falken SN828
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ComfortContact CC6 or SN828?
Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or SN828?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 65 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or SN828?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 64 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or SN828?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 72 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or SN828?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 65 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology