Head-to-head Updated

Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

A539 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BYokohama

A539

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 105 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    A539 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6A539
    Reviews found online6268
  2. 65

    Wet

    A539 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6A539
    Reviews found online6370
  3. 71

    Comfort

    ComfortContact CC6 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6A539
    Reviews found online7270
  4. 65

    Treadwear

    A539 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6A539
    Reviews found online6566
  5. 63

    Handling

    A539 +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6A539
    Reviews found online6374
Scores at a glance
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama A539: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ComfortContact CC6Yokohama A539
Relative Score 65 69
Dry 64 68
Wet 65 70
Comfort 71 69
Treadwear 65 66
Handling 63 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ComfortContact CC6

A539

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ComfortContact CC6

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
  • Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
  • Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
  • Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ComfortContact CC6 review

Tire B A539

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
  • Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
  • Good braking performance

Cons

  • Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
  • Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
  • Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
All owner themes in the A539 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 B · Yokohama A539
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—6
Rim diameters—12″ – 14″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ComfortContact CC6

Yokohama A539

Winner: Yokohama A539 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama A539 scores 74 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama A539 scores 70 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama A539 scores 68 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Yokohama A539

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

69

Narrow edge

A539

Amazon