Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
A539 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
A539 +468Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 A539 Reviews found online 62 68 -
65
Wet
A539 +570Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 A539 Reviews found online 63 70 -
71
Comfort
ComfortContact CC6 +269Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 A539 Reviews found online 72 70 -
65
Treadwear
A539 +166Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 A539 Reviews found online 65 66 -
63
Handling
A539 +1174Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 A539 Reviews found online 63 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 69 |
| Dry | 64 | 68 |
| Wet | 65 | 70 |
| Comfort | 71 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 66 |
| Handling | 63 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ComfortContact CC6
A539
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B A539
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
- Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
- Good braking performance
Cons
- Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
- Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
- Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 12″ – 14″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ComfortContact CC6
Yokohama A539
Winner: Yokohama A539 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama A539 scores 74 vs 63 on handling.
Yokohama A539 scores 70 vs 65 on wet.
Yokohama A539 scores 68 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.