Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs General Grabber AT3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 28 + 251 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber AT3 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 251 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Grabber AT3 +271Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 69 78 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 77.8 = 71
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Level72Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 72 78 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 72
Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 78.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
Grabber AT3 +1475Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 54 73 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 61
Grabber AT3: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 72.8 = 75
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Grabber AT3 +975Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 65 77 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.5 = 66
Grabber AT3: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
Grabber AT3 +576Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 74 82 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 71
Grabber AT3: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Grabber AT3 +574Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Grabber AT3 Reviews found online 69 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison52Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 73 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 72 | 72 |
| Snow | 61 | 75 |
| Comfort | 66 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
Grabber AT3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Grabber AT3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 85% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 97% #5/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 84% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 85% #7/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 82% #3/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 92% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 96% #2/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 86% #5/7 · Best All Terrain Tyres Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | #3/5 2025 Wybór Kierowców Off Road Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Grabber AT3
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
- Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
- Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
- Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber AT3
Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.
“I feel not many people in this group will like this but I'll post for the hell of it. Some 215/60/17 general grabber at3 I fitted to my A4 to test if it would fit from the standard 225/50/17”
“I have at3’s on my 19 f250 , I love them 23,000 miles on them and maybe I’m halfway into the tread life . I’m easily getting at least 40,000 miles out of them probably close to 50,000 till I get a new set .”
“I've always used KO2s but was getting really low miles out of a set on my 1 ton van for some reason. Switched to AT3s and pretty happy with them.”
Based on 20 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 39 | 77 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A A |
| Sizes in common | 32 | 32 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
General Grabber AT3
Narrow edge: General Grabber AT3 — better snow, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 61 on snow.
General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 66 on comfort.
General Grabber AT3 scores 76 vs 71 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Grabber AT3?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Grabber AT3?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Grabber AT3?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 76 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology