tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or ContiCrossContact LX 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7077

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7275

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5562

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 61

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6675

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7175

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6971
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 69 72
Dry 69 73
Wet 72 74
Snow 61 65
Comfort 68 72
Noise – 70
Treadwear 69 71
Handling (owners) 69 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiCrossContact LX 2

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryContiCrossContact LX 2DynaPro A/TM RF10ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/8 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3929
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better dry, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 65 vs 61 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX 2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology