Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test (subj. comfort)

Tire BToyo

Proxes CF2 SUV

Summer

Tests 62 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 8 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (straight aqua)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–56
    Reviews found online7073
    Dry Braking (% of best)85%92%
    Dry Handling (% of best)98%98%
  2. 72

    Wet

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–65
    Reviews found online7273
    Wet Braking (% of best)82%89%
    Wet Handling (% of best)92%94%
  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes CF2 SUV
    Reviews found online55–
  4. 68

    Comfort

    Proxes CF2 SUV +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–62
    Reviews found online6778
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–74
  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes CF2 SUV
    Reviews found online7169
  7. 69

    Handling

    Proxes CF2 SUV +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes CF2 SUV
    Reviews found online6973
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Relative Score 70 68
Dry 69 63
Wet 72 69
Snow 61 –
Comfort 68 69
Noise – 71
Treadwear 69 67
Handling 69 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiCrossContact LX 2

Proxes CF2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes CF2 SUVΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 85% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 92% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test −7.4 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 98% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test −0.5 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 81% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test +13.1 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 13% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 14% #7/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test −1.8 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 84% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 96% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test −11.9 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 100% #1/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 80% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test +20.0 Different tests
Subj. Noise Subj 100% #1/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 67% #6/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test +33.3 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 82% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 89% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test −7.3 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 92% #8/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test 94% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test −2.2 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B Proxes CF2 SUV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3929
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better dry and wet. Pick the Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 73 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 72 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Narrow edge

ContiCrossContact LX 2

Amazon