Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 28 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiCrossContact LX 2 and Quatrac 2 are level at 69.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Level69Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Quatrac 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 69 69 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69
Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
Level72Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Quatrac 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 72 73 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Quatrac 2: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
Quatrac 2 +566Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Quatrac 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 54 64 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 61
Quatrac 2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
Quatrac 2 +470Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Quatrac 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 70 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.1 = 66
Quatrac 2: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Quatrac 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +269Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Quatrac 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 71 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 71
Quatrac 2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
70
Handling (owners)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +961Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Quatrac 2 Reviews found online 70 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Vredestein Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 69 |
| Dry | 69 | 69 |
| Wet | 72 | 72 |
| Snow | 61 | 66 |
| Comfort | 66 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
ContiCrossContact LX 2
69
/ 100
Quatrac 2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Quatrac 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Higher road noise levels compared to dedicated summer tires
- Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight decrease in fuel economy
- Perceived lack of sidewall rigidity and road feedback
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Vredestein Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
69
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac 2
Too close to call: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 and Vredestein Quatrac 2 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is stronger on handling. Vredestein Quatrac 2 is stronger on snow and comfort. Vredestein Quatrac 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 70 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 66 vs 61 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 70 vs 66 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Quatrac 2?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Quatrac 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Quatrac 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Quatrac 2?
Vredestein Quatrac 2, 66 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Quatrac 2?
Vredestein Quatrac 2, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Quatrac 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology