Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 41 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 72–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1262Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 77 59 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 62
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1459Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 73 54 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 59
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison58Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online – 49 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.7 = 58
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1257Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 70 51 ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 69
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 40% × 65.1 (est.) + 60% × 50.8 = 57
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 62 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65
No road tests of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +955Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 63 48 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
78
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +2652Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season Reviews found online 78 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 58 |
| Dry | 74 | 62 |
| Wet | 73 | 59 |
| Snow | – | 58 |
| Comfort | 69 | 57 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiMaxContact MC6
Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality with minimal road noise
- Reliable traction on dry and wet surfaces
- Competent performance in light snow and winter conditions
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by certain users, especially on the shoulders
- Shorter overall lifespan compared to some original equipment tire alternatives
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Ultra High Performance All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 78 vs 52 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 73 vs 59 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 69 vs 57 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 73 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 69 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric All-Season?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 64 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology