Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 and Eagle F1 Directional 5 are level at 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Eagle F1 Directional 5
    Reviews found online7774
  2. 72

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Directional 5 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Eagle F1 Directional 5
    Reviews found online7374
  3. 70

    Comfort

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Eagle F1 Directional 5
    Reviews found online7069
  4. 65

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Directional 5 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Eagle F1 Directional 5
    Reviews found online6466
  5. 76

    Handling

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Eagle F1 Directional 5
    Reviews found online7675
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5
Relative Score 71 71
Dry 74 71
Wet 72 73
Comfort 70 69
Treadwear 65 66
Handling 76 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiMaxContact MC6

Eagle F1 Directional 5

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B Eagle F1 Directional 5

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip, often inspiring confidence in wet conditions
  • High value for money and lower price point compared to premium alternatives
  • Strong steering response and exceptional road feedback/feel

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls reported by several users, which can affect heavier vehicles or require higher PSI
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality noted by some drivers
  • Can feel slightly 'greasy' or lose peak performance during prolonged hard driving
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Directional 5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3—
Rim diameters19″ – 21″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5

Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Too close to call

ContiMaxContact MC6

Amazon