Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 and Ventus S1 evo2 are level at 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 2,127 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Level74Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 77 70 -
72
Wet
Ventus S1 evo2 +678Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 73 73 -
70
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +169Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 70 64 -
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 -
65
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +362Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo2 Reviews found online 64 60 -
76
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +967Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo2 Reviews found online 76 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 74 | 74 |
| Wet | 72 | 78 |
| Comfort | 70 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling | 76 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ContiMaxContact MC6
Ventus S1 evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B Ventus S1 evo2
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip performance
- Strong value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin or Continental
- Crisp steering response and confident cornering handling
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-performance vehicles
- Increased road noise and harsher ride quality as the tire ages and tread depth lowers
- Occasional reports of structural weaknesses such as sidewall bulges or cracking
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 61 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 16″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on handling and treadwear. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 is stronger on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 67 on handling.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 78 vs 72 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.