Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact vs Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport A/S 3 is ahead, 76–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +10
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactPilot Sport A/S 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6782

    ContiProContact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.3 = 77

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +16
    81
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactPilot Sport A/S 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 78 (est.)
    Reviews found online6384

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactPilot Sport A/S 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5672

    ContiProContact: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 71

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactPilot Sport A/S 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5971

    ContiProContact: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.2 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact or Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactPilot Sport A/S 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactPilot Sport A/S 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6071

    ContiProContact: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +19
    82
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactPilot Sport A/S 3
    Reviews found online6382
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiProContact vs Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiProContactMichelin Pilot Sport A/S 3
Relative Score 64 76
Dry 67 77
Wet 65 81
Snow 62 71
Comfort 62 71
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 62 69
Handling (owners) 63 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiProContact

± 8

Pilot Sport A/S 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Tire B Pilot Sport A/S 3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding cornering stability and steering responsiveness
  • Stiff sidewalls providing superior handling compared to competitors

Cons

  • Noticeable and bothersome road noise
  • Heavy tire construction
  • Shorter than expected tread life for certain drivers on abrasive surfaces
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport A/S 3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available566
Rim diameters15″ – 19″19″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 12/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 82 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 81 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 77 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 71 vs 62 on snow.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact or Pilot Sport A/S 3?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or Pilot Sport A/S 3?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 81 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or Pilot Sport A/S 3?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 77 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiProContact or Pilot Sport A/S 3?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 71 vs 62 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or Pilot Sport A/S 3?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 71 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or Pilot Sport A/S 3?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 69 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology