Nexen N1000 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact vs Nexen N1000 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 19 owner reviews. How we score

ContiProContact is ahead, 64–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N1000
Tire BNexen

N1000

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 19 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    ContiProContact +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN1000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6653

    ContiProContact: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    N1000: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for N1000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    ContiProContact +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN1000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6355

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    N1000: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 59

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N1000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN1000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    ContiProContact: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 62

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    ContiProContact +8
    53
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN1000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5846

    ContiProContact: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    N1000: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.3 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for N1000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN1000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    ContiProContact +6
    56
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN1000
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6050

    ContiProContact: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    N1000: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for N1000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    ContiProContact +11
    51
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN1000
    Reviews found online6251
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiProContact vs Nexen N1000: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiProContactNexen N1000
Relative Score 64 57
Dry 67 58
Wet 65 59
Snow 62 –
Comfort 61 53
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 62 56
Handling (owners) 62 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiProContact

± 8

N1000

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Tire B N1000

Pros

  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Competitive price point
  • Predictable and stable dry-weather grip

Cons

  • Excessive road noise levels
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
  • Lack of steering feedback
All owner themes in the N1000 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Nexen N1000
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available56—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth9 - 12/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact

Nexen N1000

Winner: Continental ContiProContact — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N1000 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiProContact scores 67 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiProContact scores 61 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiProContact scores 65 vs 59 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Nexen N1000

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact or N1000?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or N1000?

Continental ContiProContact, 65 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or N1000?

Continental ContiProContact, 67 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or N1000?

Continental ContiProContact, 61 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or N1000?

Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology