Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 11 reviews
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Pirelli Angel GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: ContiRoad Attack and Angel GT are level at 69.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Level69Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Reviews found online 69 70 -
69
Wet
Angel GT +473Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Reviews found online 68 74 -
70
Comfort
Level70Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Reviews found online 70 71 -
68
Treadwear
ContiRoad Attack +266Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Reviews found online 70 67 -
71
Handling
ContiRoad Attack +170Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Reviews found online 71 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 69 |
| Dry | 69 | 69 |
| Wet | 69 | 73 |
| Comfort | 70 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling | 71 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiRoad Attack
Angel GT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiRoad Attack
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
Tire B Angel GT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up times
- Enhances rider confidence and offers great handling performance
Cons
- Lower than expected mileage and rapid wear reported by some users
- Front tire shoulder wear issues on heavier sport-touring bikes if the correct 'A' spec is not used
- Handling and tracking complaints on certain lighter or specific bike models compared to stock tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiRoad Attack
Pirelli Angel GT
Too close to call: Continental ContiRoad Attack and Pirelli Angel GT are within 2 points overall. Pirelli Angel GT is stronger on wet.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 73 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.