Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 11 reviews
Continental ContiRoad Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Pirelli Angel GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiRoad Attack 70, Angel GT 71.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Angel GT +271Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 72 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
Angel GT: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Angel GT +474Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 70 76 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
Angel GT: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Angel GT +170Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 70 71 ContiRoad Attack: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 69
Angel GT: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 70.8 = 70
No road tests of comfort for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Treadwear
ContiRoad Attack +466Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 66 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
Angel GT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Angel GT +172Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Angel GT Reviews found online 71 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 70 | 74 |
| Comfort | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
ContiRoad Attack
71
/ 100
Angel GT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiRoad Attack
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
Tire B Angel GT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up times
- Enhances rider confidence and offers great handling performance
Cons
- Lower than expected mileage and rapid wear reported by some users
- Front tire shoulder wear issues on heavier sport-touring bikes if the correct 'A' spec is not used
- Handling and tracking complaints on certain lighter or specific bike models compared to stock tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Continental ContiRoad Attack
71
/ 100
Pirelli Angel GT
Too close to call: Continental ContiRoad Attack and Pirelli Angel GT are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiRoad Attack is stronger on treadwear. Pirelli Angel GT is stronger on wet. Continental ContiRoad Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Angel GT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiRoad Attack scores 70 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Pirelli Angel GT scores 74 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ContiRoad Attack
Tire B · Pirelli Angel GT
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiRoad Attack or Angel GT?
Which is better in the wet, ContiRoad Attack or Angel GT?
Pirelli Angel GT, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiRoad Attack or Angel GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiRoad Attack or Angel GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiRoad Attack or Angel GT?
Continental ContiRoad Attack, 70 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology