Tests – · none yet Owners 79 · 9 reviews
Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SC looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SC — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 9 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSportAttack 2 is ahead, 77–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
ContiSportAttack 2 +1070Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Supercorsa SC Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 87 70 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 80
Diablo Supercorsa SC: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 69.6 = 70
No road tests of dry for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
78
Wet
ContiSportAttack 2 +870Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Supercorsa SC Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 81 70 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.9 = 78
Diablo Supercorsa SC: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Diablo Supercorsa SC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
ContiSportAttack 2 +1365Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Supercorsa SC Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 82 64 ContiSportAttack 2: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 82.1 = 78
Diablo Supercorsa SC: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 64 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Diablo Supercorsa SC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
ContiSportAttack 2 +364Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Supercorsa SC Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 63 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
Diablo Supercorsa SC: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Diablo Supercorsa SC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
86
Handling (owners)
ContiSportAttack 2 +1967Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Supercorsa SC Reviews found online 86 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SC |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 68 |
| Dry | 80 | 70 |
| Wet | 78 | 70 |
| Comfort | 78 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSportAttack 2
Diablo Supercorsa SC
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportAttack 2
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Tire B Diablo Supercorsa SC
Pros
- Exceptional cornering grip and traction
- Rapid warm-up time
- Consistent and predictable handling feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear leading to short service life
- Front tire may reach wear indicators significantly faster than the rear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | B · Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SC
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Diablo Supercorsa SC rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 86 vs 67 on handling.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 65 on comfort.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 80 vs 70 on dry.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 70 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Supercorsa SC?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Supercorsa SC?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Supercorsa SC?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 80 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Supercorsa SC?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Supercorsa SC?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology