Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs General Grabber HTS60 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 14 + 492 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber HTS60 is ahead, 74–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 77 · 492 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I currently have the Grabber HTS 60s on my Lariat and they ride and handle well. I I liked them so much that when I traded my 23 XLT for my current lariat, I kept the tires. Ditto on the Michelins, they changed the compound on the Defender and now it is a much stiffer riding tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Grabber HTS60 +1074Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 62 78 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 74
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Grabber HTS60 +1276Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 63 78 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 76
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
Grabber HTS60 +1770Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 41 69 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Grabber HTS60 +873Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 60 77 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 80 Grabber HTS60: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.4 = 73
No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Grabber HTS60 +1075Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 64 77 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Grabber HTS60 +1577Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber HTS60 Reviews found online 62 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | General Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 74 |
| Dry | 64 | 74 |
| Wet | 64 | 76 |
| Snow | 53 | 70 |
| Comfort | 65 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Cross Contact A/T
74
/ 100
Grabber HTS60
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Cross Contact A/T | Grabber HTS60 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/7 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test | #2/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B Grabber HTS60
Pros
- Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
- Great value and affordable price point compared to premium brands
- Reliable all-season traction in wet, dry, and light winter conditions
Cons
- Occasional reports of minor road noise or hum at higher speeds
- Potential manufacturing inconsistencies, such as tires being out-of-round
- Aggressive tread pattern can occasionally cause slight slippage on loose dirt or debris when taking off
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental Cross Contact A/T
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
General Grabber HTS60
Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.
f150lightningforum.com
·3 upvotes ·2023-08-25
“Not a Lightning tire, but here is a picture of a defective tire I had on my Focus. Tires had less than a thousand miles on them. I know the pressure was good because I constantly check it, and my TPMS light wasn't on. I found the tread section. It rolled past me as I slowed down on the interstate. There were no punctures or deformities I could find.”
f150forum.com
“If you're not going off-road, I'd suggest General Grabber HTS60. I just put 4 on my 2014 XLT SC 5.0 4x4 for $780 out the door from a local independent tire shop in Delaware. Those were on the truck when I got it, and this is the second set I've put on. Quiet, and good in wet and moderate snow. No issues with towing my boat, a 26 ft Leisurecat. Boat is about 6100 fully loaded.”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2022-10-27
“Can’t speak for the specific iron man tires you’re looking at, but Carmax put a set of iMpve Gen 2 AS tires on our 300 when we bought it. In dry weather they were fine, wet they weren’t optimal (never hydroplaned, easy to light up the rear wheels) but manageable… god help you if there was snow. They were also worn to 3/32 in 20k miles. Discount Tire has some General Grabber HTS60’s which seem decent, though about $230 more than your most expensive example. If it were my car I’d throw some BFGoodrich Advantage TA Sport LT’s on it, I’m impressed by those.”
Top themes
#fuel and EV efficiency#budget-friendly pricing#quiet and smooth ride#highway and road performance#light towing capability#winter and wet traction#treadwear and balance issues
Based on 38 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · General Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 14/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 620 - 680 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Continental Cross Contact A/T
74
/ 100
General Grabber HTS60
Winner: General Grabber HTS60 — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
General Grabber HTS60 scores 70 vs 53 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber HTS60 scores 76 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber HTS60 scores 74 vs 64 on dry.
Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Tire B · General Grabber HTS60
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS60?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 76 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 74 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 70 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology