Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental CrossContact A/TR vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 218 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact A/TR is ahead, 71–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
CrossContact A/TR +1656Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 74 50 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
No road tests of dry for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
CrossContact A/TR +1558Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 74 54 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 73
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 58
No road tests of wet for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison61Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 55 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
CrossContact A/TR +1452Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 65 45 CrossContact A/TR: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.8 = 52
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact A/TR or Dynapro AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
CrossContact A/TR +1255Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 67 48 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
CrossContact A/TR +2447Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Dynapro AT2 Reviews found online 71 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact A/TR | Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 55 |
| Dry | 72 | 56 |
| Wet | 73 | 58 |
| Snow | – | 61 |
| Comfort | 66 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
CrossContact A/TR
55
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact A/TR
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and mileage longevity, with multiple users reporting over 70,000 to 80,000 miles (or 130,000 km) of use.
- Impressive dry grip and confident handling.
- Strong performance in snow and winter conditions, with some users highlighting exceptional traction on ice and steep gradients.
Cons
- A stiffer, more jarring, and less comfortable ride quality compared to competing all-terrain tires.
- Mixed feedback regarding hydroplaning resistance and heavy winter snow usage.
- Potential customer service and warranty claim challenges regarding premature tread wear.
Tire B Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental CrossContact A/TR
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.
r/RangerNext
·13 upvotes ·2026-09-27
“Swapped out my tires 2026 ranger fx4 So last week I installed some Sailun Terramax RT tires that ride like absolute dog shit ! I learned my lesson. And will never order cheaper tires again , I decided to go with Hankook dynapro at2 extreme this time around and I love them , yes much less agressive but a better looking tire than the Goodyear territory at that came stock with the truck !”
r/AskAMechanic
·1 upvote ·2026-08-08
“It is too damaged to keep using and or is it able to be repaired? Hello, just saw this on my tire a bit ago, thought it was a rock and pulled it out. Its a small metal piece. My question is if the the metal pierced too far in and damaged the tire to where its unsafe to use anymore. If so, is it able to be repaired? These tires are 2 months old. Hankook Dynapros at2 xtreme. Posted this on r/tires and most said it was completely fine. Thanks”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2026-05-26
“I've loved mine on a 2024 Subaru Outback Wilderness. I came from Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S which I loved but that found one too many nails. No issues after 30,000 miles on the Hankooks. I had some Dynapro MT's back on a FJ Cruiser which I loved so that's why I decided to try them again. Just in case someone with an Outback or someone looking at these sizes, here's some data I had compiled. 235/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme RF12 - Overall Diameter 29.1”, Section Width 9.6”, Tread Width 7.5” , Weight 32 lbs 245/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme RF12 - Overall Diameter 29.6”, Section Width 10”, Tread Width 7.9” , Weight 35 lbs”
Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability
Based on 47 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact A/TR | B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 35 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 - 680 A A - B | 440 - 660 A A - B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 21 | 21 |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Continental CrossContact A/TR
55
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Winner: Continental CrossContact A/TR — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental CrossContact A/TR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 71 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 72 vs 56 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 73 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 66 vs 52 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental CrossContact A/TR
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact A/TR or Dynapro AT2?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact A/TR or Dynapro AT2?
Continental CrossContact A/TR, 73 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact A/TR or Dynapro AT2?
Continental CrossContact A/TR, 72 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact A/TR or Dynapro AT2?
Continental CrossContact A/TR, 66 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact A/TR or Dynapro AT2?
Continental CrossContact A/TR, 67 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology