Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Continental Sport Contact 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 229 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 77–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 229 reviews
“You mean from BMW when bought new? Not sure, my car was pre-owned and came with those horrible Continental SC2 RFT's.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +966Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Sport Contact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 83 65 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75
Sport Contact 2: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +1466Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Sport Contact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 83 65 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80
Sport Contact 2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Sport Contact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 40 – Reviews found online 72 – CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +1957Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Sport Contact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 79 52 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
Sport Contact 2: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 52 = 57
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Sport Contact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 78 – CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +1953Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Sport Contact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 76 44 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
Sport Contact 2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +2059Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Sport Contact 2 Reviews found online 79 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Continental Sport Contact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 62 |
| Dry | 75 | 66 |
| Wet | 80 | 66 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 76 | 57 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
Sport Contact 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B Sport Contact 2
Pros
- Excellent grip and handling in both dry and wet conditions
- Predictable and progressive behavior at the limit
- Strong braking performance
Cons
- Rapid and often premature tread wear
- High levels of road noise, particularly on rough or concrete surfaces
- Poor performance in snow, ice, and freezing temperatures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental CrossContact LX25
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental Sport Contact 2
Community sentiment regarding the Continental SportContact 2 is mixed, with some drivers praising its dry and wet grip, comfort, and wear life on passenger vehicles, while others criticize its road noise and wet performance compared to competitors or dislike the run-flat version. A substantial portion of the discussions mentioning 'SC2' refer to Pirelli motorcycle track tires or Saturn SC2 cars rather than this Continental tire model.
“I've got 19,000 on my CSC 1's, and problaby another 10,000 left on them. I don't know why they're lasting so long-I'm sideways at least a couple of times a day. I've also heard of people complaining that they only lasted 8,000 miles, so it all depends on how you drive. BTW-I don't know that I would get them again-Why? Becasue now they put their freakin' website on the side of the tires in 1" tall letters. I mean, jeez...”
“I wasn't all that impressed by the SC2s that were OEM on my S4. IMO the RE050s are less noisy and better in the rain. No experience with the Sport Contact 3s though. If you're not looking for the ultimate in 10/10ths performance in all honesty I would recommend the Kumho SPTs. Pretty impressive tire and when you factor in the low cost - amazing. I am running them on my S4 for daily summer use and am 100% happy. For the C2S I'm running the Bridgestones for street and R888s for auto-x/track use.”
“Finally decided on purchasing the Continental ContiSportContact2 with 255/30/20 front and 305/25/20 rear. Traction has improved but still an issue with the TT setup. Will have to get a spare set of DRs on 18s for the track. The rear wheel is 20x10.5 29mm offset, fenders are cut. Here are some pics.”
Based on 35 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Continental Sport Contact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | 20 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | 280 AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Continental Sport Contact 2
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 59 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 57 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 53 on treadwear.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 66 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or Sport Contact 2?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Sport Contact 2?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Sport Contact 2?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Sport Contact 2?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Sport Contact 2?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology