Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken FK510 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 3 road tests and 26 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 76–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK510 SUV
Tire BFalken

FK510 SUV

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7082
    Reviews found online8365

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 75

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +3
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 77 (est.)81
    Reviews found online8372

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 71.6 = 77

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40–
    Reviews found online72–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +15
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 71 (est.)61
    Reviews found online7960

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76

    FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 60.4 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)74
    Reviews found online78≈ 66 (est.)

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +12
    60
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7655

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +12
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25FK510 SUV
    Reviews found online7967
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    44
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–44
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken FK510 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Falken FK510 SUV
Relative Score 76 71
Dry 75 75
Wet 80 77
Snow 53 –
Comfort 76 61
Noise 71 71
Treadwear 72 60
Handling (owners) 79 67
Efficiency – 44

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 6

FK510 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25FK510 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #3/10 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B FK510 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
  • Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
  • Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
All owner themes in the FK510 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Falken FK510 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4048
Rim diameters16″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common2121

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Falken FK510 SUV

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 77 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Falken FK510 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology