Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken FK510 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 3 road tests and 26 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 76–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Level75Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 70 82 Reviews found online 83 65 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75
FK510 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 75
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +377Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 77 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 83 72 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80
FK510 SUV: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 71.6 = 77
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 40 – Reviews found online 72 – CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +1561Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 79 60 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 60.4 = 61
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
Level71Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 78 ≈ 66 (est.) CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71
FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +1260Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 76 55 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +1267Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 FK510 SUV Reviews found online 79 67 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison44Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 FK510 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 44
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Falken FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 75 |
| Wet | 80 | 77 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 76 | 61 |
| Noise | 71 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 67 |
| Efficiency | – | 44 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
FK510 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | FK510 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #3/10 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B FK510 SUV
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
- Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback
Cons
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
- Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
- Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Falken FK510 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 40 | 48 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 21 | 21 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Falken FK510 SUV
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 60 on treadwear.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 67 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 77 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 77 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or FK510 SUV?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology