Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 26 + 2,588 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–73
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 82 · 2,588 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossClimate 2 SUV +1287Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests 70 86 Reviews found online 83 88 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.1 = 87
-
80
Wet
CrossClimate 2 SUV +484Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 78 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 83 85 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 80
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 84.7 = 84
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
CrossClimate 2 SUV +3790Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests 40 97 Reviews found online 72 80 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.6 = 53
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.4 + 40% × 79.9 = 90
-
76
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 SUV +985Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 79 88 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81.3 + 60% × 87.6 = 85
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
71
Noise
CrossClimate 2 SUV +576Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 77 ≈ 66 (est.) CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +270Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 76 73 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate 2 SUV +1089Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 CrossClimate 2 SUV Reviews found online 79 89 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison87Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 87
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 83 |
| Dry | 75 | 87 |
| Wet | 80 | 84 |
| Snow | 53 | 90 |
| Comfort | 76 | 85 |
| Noise | 71 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 89 |
| Efficiency | – | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | CrossClimate 2 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
- Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
- Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
- Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
- Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental CrossContact LX25
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.
“Opinions please ... Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV? Hi all ... I'm coming up to tyre replacement time so I've looking at what's around. Currently on Bridgestone Turanzas cos that's what came with the car, but I'm not hugely impressed with their lifespan, they seem to pick up sidewall damage easily and the tread seems to age quickly. Which is not much cop when all i do is commute round Southern England. I've pretty much settled on Michelin Primacy 4+ or Cross Climate 2 SUV but I'm having difficulty making a final decision. So I thought the hivemind might settle this: in your experience which one is best for lifespan and fuel consumption? Car is a 2018 SEAT Ateca with 18" alloys. Edit: well guys, I went with the Cross Climates, thanks for the advice!”
“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”
“CrossClimate 2 SUV not offered in 245/60R18, what would be the closest alternative? I'm trying to buy the best tires for a family SUV (Ford Edge) driving in south-east USA. Being able to drive in very wet conditions (hydroplaning resistance) safely and comfort/quiet are high priorities. Ice/general handling are also important to me but less high-prio since we don't get a lot of snow and it's a family SUV that is mostly not driven spirited. Treadwear/Cost is lowest priority, I just want the safest option, but ideally it wouldn't wear out too fast, at least 40-50k miles if that's reasonable. I can't find any CrossClimate 2 SUV sets in this size and those would be my first choice. Is it better to just get regular CrossClimate 2's in that size or should I get the SUV oriented Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive (this is what Tirerack is recommending me to get)? I've come to realize the CrossClimate 3's wont be here in time before the tires become too unsafe to drive on, which is extremely unfortunate timing.”
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 40 | 35 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 18 | 18 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better snow, dry and handling. Where the Continental CrossContact LX25 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 90 vs 53 on snow.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 75 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 79 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 85 vs 76 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 80 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 90 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 76 vs 71 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 76 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology