Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 61 · 1,649 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I had continental contact 5 on my juke had to replace fronts at 8000 mile mostly town driving and they were a bit noisy”
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental Eco Contact 5 vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 18 road tests and 1,649 + 1,596 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac is ahead, 82–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 1,596 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are good tyres. I prefer the vredestein quite comfortable tyres and quieter than the Hankook. But you can't go wrong with either of them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Quatrac +1681Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests 68 83 Reviews found online 60 78 Eco Contact 5: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 60.2 = 65
Quatrac: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 77.6 = 81
-
66
Wet
Quatrac +2591Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests 68 95 Reviews found online 62 85 Eco Contact 5: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 62.3 = 66
Quatrac: 60% × 94.7 + 40% × 85.4 = 91
-
–
Snow
No comparison74Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 74 Reviews found online – 73 Quatrac: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 72.8 = 74
-
60
Comfort
Quatrac +1474Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 56 74 Eco Contact 5: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.4 = 60
Quatrac: 40% × 74.4 + 60% × 73.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Eco Contact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 78 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Quatrac: 60% × 78 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
63
Treadwear
Quatrac +1275Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 61 77 Eco Contact 5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 77 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for Eco Contact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
Quatrac +1676Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 Quatrac Reviews found online 60 76 -
77
Efficiency
Eco Contact 5 +473Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 13 tests 77 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Eco Contact 5 | Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 82 |
| Dry | 65 | 81 |
| Wet | 66 | 91 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 60 | 74 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 76 |
| Efficiency | 77 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Eco Contact 5
82
/ 100
Quatrac
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eco Contact 5 | Quatrac | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #8/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 90% #8/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 90% #11/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 97% #3/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 93% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/12 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | #2/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eco Contact 5
Pros
- Exceptional fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Strong dry pavement grip and handling stability
- Impressive longevity and tread wear mileage for many drivers
Cons
- Subpar wet weather grip and frequent wheel-spin in the rain
- Thin, delicate sidewalls susceptible to bulging and pothole damage
- Loud, intrusive road noise on coarse or rough asphalt
Tire B Quatrac
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces
Cons
- Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
- Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Continental Eco Contact 5
Community feedback on the Continental Eco Contact 5 is mixed, with drivers noting satisfactory performance for standard road driving but expressing concerns over rapid treadwear and road noise. Several users question their traction on slippery surfaces and compare them against alternative budget and premium options.
Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#road noise levels#traction on slippery surfaces#pricing versus competitors#factory tire replacement
Based on 6 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Vredestein Quatrac
Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers viewing it as one of the best mid-range all-weather tires available. Users frequently praise its reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions, along with its quiet and comfortable ride compared to rivals. While some owners note that stopping distances on ice or deep snow do not match dedicated winter tires and tread wear can vary, most consider it an exceptional value over premium brands like Michelin.
mdxers.org
·2021-02-02
“I have used Vredestein Quatrac on my 2012 Camry Hybrid XLE. The car has about 130K miles on it and about 50k on the Vredestein Quatrac. Amazing tires ! M+S rated and excellent traction and grip in rain and snow. Wear a bit faster though. Lasted about 45k miles on my Camry . These are my preferred tires for this car.”
myoutlanderphev.com
·2018-03-15
“I had been looking at summer tires due to the fact the Toyo are too. Was looking at these: They get decent reviews The rolling restistance and grip are good too. It is rated as having better grip in the wet than the Vredestein Quatrac: Would have thought the all weather would have better wet grip? Will make a decision tomorrow. I'm in on west of Ireland coast. It's wet rarely icy here, snow would be extreme -only once got proper snow in the last 15 years - the beast from east! Cheers”
alltrac.net
·2025-04-09
“I agree with all of that. The Vredesteins are good, at least the set I have was. I’ll give them another shot at $600. If the sidewalls are a bit fragile to get that lightness, I suppose that’s something to keep in mind. Most people just don’t think about their car and don’t want to. They just want to go to work and get home after work. People have weird expectations of their tires. Whether this is a joke or not it might as well be a genuine review because certainly there’s someone out there for whom this is true.”
Top themes
#mid-range tire value#snow and winter performance#wet weather traction#quiet and comfortable ride#tread life longevity#all-weather capability
Based on 34 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact 5 | B · Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A B |
| Sizes in common | 21 | 21 |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Continental Eco Contact 5
82
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Continental Eco Contact 5 if efficiency matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac scores 91 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Quatrac scores 76 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 60 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental Eco Contact 5
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eco Contact 5 or Quatrac?
Which is better in the wet, Eco Contact 5 or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 91 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eco Contact 5 or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eco Contact 5 or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eco Contact 5 or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Eco Contact 5 or Quatrac?
Continental Eco Contact 5, 77 vs 73 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology