Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 8 reviews
Continental Eco Contact EP looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental Eco Contact EP vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 12 road tests and 8 + 5,824 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is ahead, 74–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 12 tests Owners 69 · 5,824 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (dry braking)
“I've got just that on my coupe and love the tyres! massive difference from my fk453s that I have on my csl reps. took 300ish miles to properly bead in but now they're brilliant!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +874Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 65 72 Eco Contact EP: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 71.8 = 74
No road tests of dry for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +1179Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 68 77 Eco Contact EP: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 76.5 = 79
No road tests of wet for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison59Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online – 51 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 59
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +472Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 73 Eco Contact EP: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.3 = 68
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 73.1 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 64 Reviews found online – 76 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 76.3 = 69
-
69
Treadwear
Eco Contact EP +168Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 70 66 Eco Contact EP: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 66 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 +1374Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Reviews found online 61 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison75Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Eco Contact EP | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 74 |
| Dry | 66 | 74 |
| Wet | 68 | 79 |
| Snow | – | 59 |
| Comfort | 68 | 72 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eco Contact EP
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eco Contact EP
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High fuel efficiency
- Reliable grip in dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Vague or weak steering feedback
- Poor performance in snowy conditions
- Susceptibility to sidewall and tread cracking after long-term aging
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and compliance over bumps
- Low road noise levels, especially compared to OEM or competitor alternatives
- Strong wet and dry grip for everyday and spirited driving
Cons
- Softer sidewalls lead to a somewhat mushy or less precise steering feel when pushed hard
- Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bubbles, or punctures from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental Eco Contact EP
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Community members frequently consider the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as an affordable alternative when replacing factory run-flats, praising its handling, low road noise, and strong grip compared to earlier tires. However, sentiment is tempered by criticism of its poor snow capability as a summer tire, complaints about the RunOnFlat variant from performance car owners, and mixed tread wear reports compared to rivals like Michelin.
“I've run Conti 5P's on my E63's and they grip well in both wet and dry, last reasonably (circa 13k miles on the rear, a little further on the front, and I change my tyres when they're down to 2.5mm - 3mm of tread), but are a bit noisy. My wife's SLK55 is on 5P's too and the fronts last about 20k, the rears 12k - 13k. Are you running MO-spec tyres or the generic version? This can have a significant effect on life expectancy. FWIW, I'm now running Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3's on my E63. They grip as well as, if not better than, the 5P's and are noticeably quieter. I've got 11.5k miles on the current set and they still have a good 5mm of tread remaining, so I anticipate that they will run to at least 14k miles.”
“Most recent 3 tyres for me: Current at >40,000km - Bridgestone Potenza RE003 ~20,000km - Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ~35,000km - Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 The Pilot Sport 4 has been my favourite of the three by far - handling felt just as good as the Goodyear Eagle F1 whilst having less road noise and incredible wet grip, but they just didn't last long. But I enjoyed them so much I'll try the Pilot Sport 5's next as they supposedly have improvements to tread wear.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Trigger I phoned around a number of local tire shops today for price & availability for the Potenza Sport; Conti Extreme Contact Sport 02, and the Michelin PS4-S, and nobody could see any of them (in the 215/45/17) available across Canada! TireRack delivers to Canada, does it? If I choose one of the Canada post codes as a location then it does show me both 205/45R17 and 215/45R17 available. Quote: Originally Posted by Trigger Another tire that has come across my radar which equals the Michelin PS4-S is the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport… Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (F1A3) and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3R (F1A3R) are available in the U.S. in stock 205/45R17 size. No other Goodyear summer performance tires are offered in Miata sizes in the U.S. Supersport is 19 inch and larger, I think. F1A3 is a competitor to PS4S, I've considered it for my previous Mustang V8, but poor wet performance put me off. Dry performance seems to be fine. I have not tried it myself. F1A3R is essentially a track tire with 100 treadwear. I haven't seen people in person who drove these on a Miata. If my goal was an ultimate grip I'd probably start with more known tire, maybe Bridgestone RE71RS.”
Based on 32 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact EP | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 - 300 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 42 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Eco Contact EP
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better handling, wet and dry. Where the Continental Eco Contact EP is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental Eco Contact EP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 74 vs 61 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 79 vs 68 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eco Contact EP or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Which is better in the wet, Eco Contact EP or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 79 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eco Contact EP or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eco Contact EP or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eco Contact EP or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology