Continental Eco Contact EP looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental Eco Contact EP vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 8 + 2,560 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,560 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I also live in Michigan and we get plenty of all four seasons. I put CC2s on my 2017 RAV4 Hybrid. They have handled all weather conditions up to and including moderate snow with aplomb. If I had to buy new tires tomorrow, I'd get another set.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +21
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact EPCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 67 (est.)86
    Reviews found online6689

    Eco Contact EP: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.8 + 40% × 88.7 = 87

    No road tests of dry for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +15
    84
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact EPCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 69 (est.)84
    Reviews found online6885

    Eco Contact EP: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 84 + 40% × 84.9 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    91
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact EPCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–98
    Reviews found online–80

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.6 + 40% × 80.4 = 91

  4. 68

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +18
    86
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact EPCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)82
    Reviews found online6888

    Eco Contact EP: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.9 = 68

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 82.3 + 60% × 88.3 = 86

    No road tests of comfort for Eco Contact EP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact EPCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–83
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact EPCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7073

    Eco Contact EP: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +28
    89
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact EPCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online6189
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact EPCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–87
Scores at a glance
Continental Eco Contact EP vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Eco Contact EPMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 67 83
Dry 66 87
Wet 69 84
Snow – 91
Comfort 68 86
Noise – 77
Treadwear 68 70
Handling (owners) 61 89
Efficiency – 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score

Eco Contact EP

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eco Contact EP

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • High fuel efficiency
  • Reliable grip in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Vague or weak steering feedback
  • Poor performance in snowy conditions
  • Susceptibility to sidewall and tread cracking after long-term aging
All owner themes in the Eco Contact EP review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental Eco Contact EP

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its exceptional grip and safety in snow, slush, and heavy rain. The primary trade-offs frequently cited are reduced fuel/range efficiency—particularly noted by EV owners—along with a premium price tag, directional rotation limitations, and mixed opinions on road noise.

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by Gitzer I think the advice on this thread is exactly right. In fact, don’t drive your new car if there is any snow or ice on the road. Get the CC2s or equivalent immediately. You are going to need them next winter anyway. Lots of people are recommending, the CCs but aren’t they all-seasons? It seems like if I’m already stuck owning Summer tires, I’m better off buying an winter set and alternating, vs owning a Summer a All Season, no? What’s killing me is no one has or can order winter tires this late in the season. it’s really frustrating that the brand new luxury car doesn’t come with all seasons, or some tires that are even safe to opperate where the vehicle was sold. Im literally going to have to rent a a car on cold days to keep my family safe ☹️”

bobistheoilguy.com ·1 upvote ·2025-07-21

“You got that right! Between my local tire shop and many on here claiming the CC2s was the greatest thing since the forward pass I took the plunge. Last week I took the manager for a ride at the tire shop and he said that’s the complaints he hears about them. He still thinks the noise is worth the trade off in the snow, even though we get next to none here anymore. They’ve been balanced on a hunter and road forced yet still vibrate at 80. When I swap out the CC2s for my lx 25s there’s no vibration whatsoever and next to no sound. The lx25s are one of the ugliest tires I’ve ever seen or I’d just run with them. My goal is to use the lx25s as a winter tire and get pro contacts to replace the Michelins, but, I can’t get the Michelins to wear out. Which is obviously a good thing considering they cost a grand. They went to 7-8/32nds and stalled like a brisket. Meanwhile at almost 2 yrs old they’re getting harder as everyday passes. Worst “premium” tire I’ve ever purchased!”

r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2026-02-12

“Look at all weather tires (3PMSF rated) instead of a basic all season. Michelin CrossClimate2 is hard to beat for safety and snow grip and they’re not that loud in my experience. I put them on my wife’s Highlander and they’ve been smooth and confident in slush and highway rain. If you want something a little quieter and softer riding, Bridgestone WeatherPeak or Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive are also solid. When I priced 245/50R20 CC2s recently, Costco was around $314 per tire installed $1,256 set before tax during a promo, Tire Rack was about $302 per tire $1,208 before install and Discounted Wheel Warehouse had them closer to $279 per tire $1,116 before install so roughly $140 difference on a set before mounting”

Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Wet grip and hydroplaning resistance#EV range and fuel efficiency impact#Road noise and ride comfort#High price and premium value#Directional tread rotation limits#Treadwear and longevity

Based on 97 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Eco Contact EP B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—35
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Eco Contact EP

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Eco Contact EP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 86 vs 68 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Continental Eco Contact EP
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eco Contact EP or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Eco Contact EP or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eco Contact EP or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eco Contact EP or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 86 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eco Contact EP or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology