Tests 86 · 1 test Owners 80 · 50 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 23 road tests and 50 + 6,469 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 87–81
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 1 test Owners 80 · 50 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,469 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 23 tests | 87 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 91 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 86 = 86
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 90.8 = 92
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 23 tests | 85 | 94 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 94 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 87.4 = 86
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 93.6 = 94
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 66 | – |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 85 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 78.5 = 75
Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 71 + 60% × 84.7 = 79
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests | ≈ 67 (est.) | 33 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 70
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 47
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 79 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 78.7 = 87
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 82 | 89 |
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests | – | 64 |
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 87 |
| Dry | 86 | 92 |
| Wet | 86 | 94 |
| Snow | 68 | – |
| Comfort | 75 | 79 |
| Noise | 70 | 47 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 87 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 89 |
| Efficiency | – | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact Sport 02
Pilot Sport 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Pilot Sport 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #2/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 95% #10/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% #1/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 91% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% #2/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #2/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 98% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 92% #2/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | #9/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
The community generally views the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 as an exceptional daily-driving tire that bridges the gap between high performance and everyday comfort. Users frequently praise its outstanding wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to more track-focused alternatives like the PS4S. However, some enthusiast drivers feel the sidewalls and feedback can feel a bit numb or soft for aggressive track use, noting it is built more for sporty road use than dedicated circuit driving.
“Michelin PS5 Delaminating Near new PS5, running a low speed track, and the fronts basically fell apart after 2 sessions. I know these aren't track-focussed tires, but is this really expected for them? Looks like the tires got too hot, but I'm just shocked how poorly they performed on a stock car (Golf R). Not sure if it's worth contacting Michelin over this or not. Read more”
“Have to replace my tyres soon, MC7 or PS5? Hi guys, I need to replace the tyres on my civic soon and I’m stuck between the MC7 and the PS5. I not a guy who will driving 180km/h in raining day so i think both performance is good enough for me. I did some research, it seems like MC7 have better performance overall. Also found that MC7 is cheaper than PS5 in my country (around RM600-700 cheaper for 4 tyres). I prefer tread life > noise/ comfort > performance (rarely drive over 120). Any feedback on the 2 brands would be super helpful. Thanks! === UPDATED === Thank you all for suggestions and opinions. So at the end i pick the MC7. Reasons: It’s possibly quieter compared to the PS5 The price is cheaper and come with 1 year premium (or what name i forgot) warranty There’s a Continental authorized dealer near my place I’ve never tried Continental before, so I decided to give it a try At the moment, the driving experience is a bit quieter than the previous PS4 (which is expected since it’s a new tire). As for performance, I haven’t really pushed it to the limit, but it’s more than sufficient for me, didn’t experience any wheel spin or loss of traction so far. One thing I do notice is that I can constantly hear small stones sticking to the tire and hitting the wheel arch which is very annoying. Also, on a personal note, I still prefer the sidewall shape of the PS5, so it took me some time to get used to the rounded sidewall of the MC7 Read more”
“Great tires, used to run the stock Pirellis but the ride comfort was atrocious and there was really no performance benefit so I switched them for some PS5.”
Based on 177 community posts
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 78 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 - 700 A - AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 35 | 35 |
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better treadwear, wet and handling. Pick the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 if noise matters most to you.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 70 vs 47 on noise.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 87 vs 73 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 94 vs 86 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 82 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 86 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 86 on our dry score.
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02, 70 vs 47 on our noise score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 79 vs 75 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 87 vs 73 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology