Tests 86 · 1 test Owners 79 · 52 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 31 road tests and 52 + 1,946 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 90–81
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 1 test Owners 79 · 52 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Tests 93 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,946 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 30 tests | 87 | 96 |
| Reviews found online | 85 | 92 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 100% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 99% |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 85.2 = 86
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 91.5 = 94
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 31 tests | 84 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 92 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 92% | 100% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 97% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 99% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 99% | 100% |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 87 = 85
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 93 + 40% × 91.6 = 92
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 65 | – |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 81 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77.5 = 75
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 81.3 = 79
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 70
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 91.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 82
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 96 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 70 |
ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 69.8 = 86
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 81 | 90 |
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests | – | 71 |
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 90 |
| Dry | 86 | 94 |
| Wet | 85 | 92 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 75 | 79 |
| Noise | 70 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 86 |
| Handling (owners) | 81 | 90 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact Sport 02
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 finished ahead 0 times and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact Sport 02 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% | 100% | −0.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 99% | +1.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% | 99% | +0.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% | 97% | +2.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% | 100% | −1.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 100% | −0.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 92% | 100% | −7.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 95% | 92% | +3.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/10 | #2/10 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test · 275/35 R19 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.
“Potential issue with Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6? I recently installed a full set of Goodyear eagle F1 A6’s to my Golf GTI, since then I’ve noticed a really bad vibration through my seat at speeds around 70mph, at first I thought it was balancing so took the car back to the workshop and had them checked, the guy said they were fine, drove it again and same issue, I then took it to another place to double check, the guy said they were .5g out, no buckles, but still the issue is present, I’m starting to get a bit pissed off with the tyres at this point, my only option now is to submit a warranty claim, but first I have to buy a new set and I only get my money back if the original tyres are defective, does anyone have any experience with these tyres? Maybe it’s just that they’re super firm tyres but they’re so uncomfortable. Read more”
“you could fit them but they are not NF rated, only 5 is NF0 and NF1 rated but on the 21" sized for the sedan.”
“Hi guys thanks for your input and sharing what you are using. I have gone for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with 20% off so worked out around £150 each fitted.”
Based on 29 community posts
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 78 | 130 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 17″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 - 700 A - AA A | 260 - 300 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 35 | 35 |
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better treadwear, noise and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 86 vs 72 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 82 vs 70 on noise.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 81 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 94 vs 86 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 92 vs 85 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 94 vs 86 on our dry score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 82 vs 70 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 75 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology