Head-to-head Updated

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 52 + 1,507 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact Sport 02 leads, 82–78 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02
± 6

Tests 86 · 1 test Owners 79 · 52 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

Michelin Pilot Super Sport
± 6

Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 82 · 1,507 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    ExtremeContact Sport 02 +4
    82
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact Sport 02Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests8777
    Reviews found online8590

    ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 85.3 = 86

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 89.8 = 82

  2. 85

    Wet

    ExtremeContact Sport 02 +8
    77
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact Sport 02Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests8473
    Reviews found online8784

    ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 87 = 85

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 73 + 40% × 83.8 = 77

  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact Sport 02Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 68

    No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact Sport 02 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact Sport 02Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7876

    ExtremeContact Sport 02: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.5 = 75

    Pilot Super Sport: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 76.2 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact Sport 02Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact Sport 02 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact Sport 02Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7573

    ExtremeContact Sport 02: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact Sport 02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Super Sport +2
    83
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact Sport 02Pilot Super Sport
    Reviews found online8183
Scores at a glance
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact Sport 02Michelin Pilot Super Sport
Relative Score 82 78
Dry 86 82
Wet 85 77
Snow 68 –
Comfort 75 74
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 72 70
Handling (owners) 81 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ExtremeContact Sport 02

± 6

Pilot Super Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryExtremeContact Sport 02Pilot Super SportΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #2/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #1/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test 95% #5/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test #2/9 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ExtremeContact Sport 02

Pros

  • Phenomenal wet and dry traction with high hydroplaning resistance
  • Superior ride comfort and compliance over bumps and road imperfections
  • Significantly lower road noise and quieter cabin compared to factory tires and rivals

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls result in a slightly mushy or less sharp initial turn-in response
  • Tread wear can be rapid, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive or staggered vehicle fitments
  • Can get greasy or lose performance rapidly when heavily pushed in sustained track environments
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact Sport 02 review

Tire B Pilot Super Sport

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Better-than-expected tread wear and mileage for a performance tire

Cons

  • Reduced grip and traction in cold weather (below 15°C)
  • Mediocre performance and tendency to aquaplane when tread wears down in heavy rain
  • High price point compared to some alternatives
All owner themes in the Pilot Super Sport review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Positive

The Michelin Pilot Super Sport is widely praised by the community as a benchmark high-performance street tire offering outstanding dry grip, sharp cornering capability, and decent ride comfort for daily driving. Many drivers note that its successor, the Pilot Sport 4S, improves upon it—especially in cold and wet conditions—while several users highlight downsides such as poor winter/snow capability, premium pricing, and eventual rubber degradation or tread cracking as the tires age.

r/cars ·1 upvote ·2016-09-30

“The Michelin PSS are great tires. I am currently running Michelin (PS3s) on my sport bike. But a more budget-minded summer tire I like for a DD car is the Yokohama s.drive. I got over 26k miles out of my last set on an S5 (some twisties, but no track use). The s.drive is cheaper, quieter, and I believe a little lighter than the PSS. The s.drives do give up grip to the PSS, for sure, but that depends on how hard you push your car on the street, if you're going to be doing track driving with these tires, how much you like being able to break it loose, and the type of car these would be going on. For a car I want to regularly exercise on weekends, I'd go PSS. For a DD that just needs to feel better than it would on an A/S tire, the s.drive is a good balance.”

mbworld.org

“Another option would be Bridgestone RE-11 or Yokohama AD-08. Both have slightly more dry traction than the PSS. The big advantage of both of these in my experience is that they have a much stiffer sidewall than the PSS. The assists with response and much less roll over which on heavier cars (like the C63 or my current M3) makes a noticeable improvement. The downside is a slightly stiffer ride, especially on the AD-08. The RE-11 are only a slight trade off in comfort for the advantages noted above. Oh yeah, PSS have better tread wear too For street driving, the PSS are the best. If the car sees track time, I would personally lean towards RE-11. I ran both on my M3 and enjoyed the steering response and grip improvement of the RE-11 over the PSS but mainly because I get out several times a year to the track. When my C63 arrives, I will swap out the wheels (and use them for winter wheels), sell the OEM tires and put after market wheels and RE-11 tires on the car.”

rdforum.org ·1 upvote ·2016-09-06

“Re: Best summer tires & Best winter tires! I run PSS on my M Roadster during the summer and do a couple of weeks each summer of some very fast paced driving with our car club on mountain roads. I have tried a number of tires over the years and PSS for me have the best balance of wet and dry traction with a great feel for how close you are to the edge of performance. I have been getting 2 years on the rear tires and 3 years on the front tires. Another brand of very good winter tire is Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2's.”

Top themes
#Dry grip and cornering#Comparison to PS4S#Poor snow performance#Tread life and wear#High purchase price#Age and cracking issues#Daily driving comfort

Based on 364 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7850
Rim diameters15″ – 21″17″ – 23″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG340 - 700 A - AA A300 AA A
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common3434

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Narrow edge: Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 — better wet and dry. Where the Michelin Pilot Super Sport is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 85 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 scores 86 vs 82 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ExtremeContact Sport 02 or Pilot Super Sport?

Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact Sport 02 or Pilot Super Sport?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02, 85 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact Sport 02 or Pilot Super Sport?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02, 86 vs 82 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact Sport 02 or Pilot Super Sport?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact Sport 02 or Pilot Super Sport?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology