Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 17 road tests and 6,409 + 1,583 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)
“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
83
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +6
77
Why this score
Source
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Quatrac
Reviews found online
83
77
–
Efficiency
No comparison
73
Why this score
Source
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Quatrac
Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests
–
73
Scores at a glance
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS vs Vredestein Quatrac: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Vredestein Quatrac
Relative Score
78
81
Dry
80
81
Wet
81
92
Snow
77
74
Comfort
80
73
Noise
75
74
Treadwear
69
75
Handling (owners)
83
77
Efficiency
–
73
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
± 5
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
81
/ 100
± 4
Quatrac
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
Discipline
Category
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Quatrac
Δ
Head-to-head
Dry Braking
Dry
99%#2/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
90%#8/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Dry Circle
Dry
97%#3/4 · Tire Rack Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
99%#3/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
100%#1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
99%#2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark)
Dry
88%#3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test
90%#2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Wet Braking
Wet
92%#3/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
100%#1/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
99%#3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test
99%#2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark)
Wet
97%#2/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test
90%#2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Ice Braking
Snow
100%#1/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test
91%#13/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Snow Braking
Snow
92%#3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test
93%#7/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Snow Handling
Snow
98%#2/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test
99%#4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark)
Comfort
99%#2/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
78%#5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Noise
Noise
99%#4/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
98%#6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Noise (tester's mark)
Noise
96%#4/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
88%#2/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Road Rating (tester's mark)
Other
94%#2/4 · Tire Rack Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
90%#3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
#3/52025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test
#2/92027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16
–
Different tests
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Pros
Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities
Cons
Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Positive
The community widely praises the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus as a top-tier ultra-high-performance all-season tire, often comparing it favorably to Michelin competitors. Users frequently highlight its exceptional wet traction, comfortable and quiet ride quality, and surprising winter capabilities for an all-season tire. While a few note softer sidewalls or minor balancing quirks, the overall consensus is overwhelmingly positive regarding daily driving performance and value.
#Wet Weather Traction#Ride Comfort and Noise#Winter and Snow Performance#Handling and Grip#Tread Life and Longevity#Michelin Comparison#Value and Pricing
Based on 139 community posts
Tire B
Vredestein Quatrac
Positive
Community members widely view the Vredestein Quatrac lineup as a high-value, comfortable, and quiet alternative to more expensive premium tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Drivers frequently praise its smooth ride quality and dependable wet and light-to-moderate snow traction, though several note it does not match dedicated snow tires in severe winter conditions. Concerns occasionally arise regarding faster tread wear, shoulder chunking, and rolling resistance.
#Ride comfort and low noise#Wet and rain traction#Snow and winter capability#Affordable premium alternative#Tread wear and longevity#Shoulder wear and chunking#Rolling resistance and EV range
Based on 64 community posts
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
B · Vredestein Quatrac
Category
All Season
All Season
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
120
39
Rim diameters
16″ – 22″
15″ – 18″
Tread depth
10/32″
—
UTQG
560 - 740 A - AA A
—
Treadwear warranty
50,000 mi
—
Sidewall
Black Side Wall
—
Max pressure
50 - 51 psi
—
Sizes in common
9
9
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
81
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac
Narrow edge: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS if comfort, handling and snow matter most to you.
Pick tire BYour priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac scores 92 vs 81 on wet.
Pick tire AYou want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 73 on comfort.
Pick tire AYou enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 83 vs 77 on handling.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology