Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 8 reviews
Continental ExtremeWinterContact vs General Eurovan Winter 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ExtremeWinterContact is ahead, 73–50
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
ExtremeWinterContact +2645Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact Eurovan Winter 2 Reviews found online 73 32 -
76
Wet
ExtremeWinterContact +2353Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact Eurovan Winter 2 Reviews found online 78 47 -
74
Snow
ExtremeWinterContact +1064Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact Eurovan Winter 2 Reviews found online 77 59 -
71
Comfort
ExtremeWinterContact +2348Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact Eurovan Winter 2 Reviews found online 72 28 -
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact Eurovan Winter 2 Reviews found online 63 – -
68
Treadwear
ExtremeWinterContact +1553Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact Eurovan Winter 2 Reviews found online 69 45 -
75
Handling
ExtremeWinterContact +4728Why this score
Source ExtremeWinterContact Eurovan Winter 2 Reviews found online 75 28
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeWinterContact | General Eurovan Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 50 |
| Dry | 71 | 45 |
| Wet | 76 | 53 |
| Snow | 74 | 64 |
| Comfort | 71 | 48 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | 53 |
| Handling | 75 | 28 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ExtremeWinterContact
Eurovan Winter 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeWinterContact
Pros
- Outstanding traction and grip in deep snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Performs exceptionally well in extreme cold temperatures
- Surprisingly good dry-pavement handling comparable to high-quality all-season tires
Cons
- XL (extra load) variants may exhibit increased road noise
- Slightly poorer cornering and braking performance noted on heavier load applications for XL versions
Tire B Eurovan Winter 2
Pros
- Exceptional traction in extreme off-road conditions such as mud, snow, quarries, and fields
- Reliable performance for commercial work vans operating in demanding environments
- Decent grip in general conditions reported by some users
Cons
- Significant noise and steering vibrations between 20mph and 50mph
- Rapid tread wear and structural deformation (out of shape tires)
- Weak and easily damaged sidewalls described as being like cheese
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeWinterContact | B · General Eurovan Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Van |
| Sizes available | — | 13 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 16″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeWinterContact
General Eurovan Winter 2
Winner: Continental ExtremeWinterContact — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ExtremeWinterContact scores 75 vs 28 on handling.
Continental ExtremeWinterContact scores 71 vs 45 on dry.
Continental ExtremeWinterContact scores 76 vs 53 on wet.
Continental ExtremeWinterContact scores 71 vs 48 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.