Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 4 + 559 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 1 test Owners 78 · 559 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison76Why this score
Source Premium Contact 5 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 74 Reviews found online – 78 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 78.4 = 76
-
–
Wet
No comparison76Why this score
Source Premium Contact 5 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 74 Reviews found online – 79 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 79.3 = 76
-
–
Comfort
No comparison71Why this score
Source Premium Contact 5 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 72 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.2 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source Premium Contact 5 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 76 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison73Why this score
Source Premium Contact 5 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 77 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison76Why this score
Source Premium Contact 5 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Reviews found online – 76 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison63Why this score
Source Premium Contact 5 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 75 |
| Dry | – | 76 |
| Wet | – | 76 |
| Comfort | – | 71 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | – | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 76 |
| Efficiency | – | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Premium Contact 5 SUV
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Premium Contact 5 SUV | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/9 2016 AMS SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | #4/9 2020 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Summer Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Premium Contact 5 SUV
Pros
- Excellent grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Very short dry braking distances
- Very good steering feel and confidence in wet weather
Cons
- Faster than expected tread wear and low mileage lifespan
- High noise levels that increase as the tires age
- Poor traction and usability in snow
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence-inspiring performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Noticeably lower road noise and a smoother, more comfortable ride compared to competitors
- Improved steering response and precise handling capabilities
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of traction in snow and wintry conditions
- Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight drop in fuel economy or EV efficiency for some users
- Susceptibility to varying road surface textures, which can occasionally alter cabin noise levels
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 44 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 - 300 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV
Only Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology