Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 42 + 2 road tests and 2,358 + 20 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 82–66
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,358 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 39 / 2 tests | 88 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 62 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 100% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 100% | 99% |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78 = 84
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 61.9 = 68
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 40 / 2 tests | 88 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 65 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 94% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 99% | 99% |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 80.4 = 85
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 65.4 = 72
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 77 | – |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests | 80 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 57 |
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.4 + 60% × 70.7 = 75
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.7 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests | 43 | – |
| Reviews found online | 72 | – |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.3 = 55
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 88 | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 47 |
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65 = 79
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 61 |
| Source | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / – tests | 74 | – |
| Category | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 66 |
| Dry | 84 | 68 |
| Wet | 85 | 72 |
| Snow | 74 | – |
| Comfort | 75 | 61 |
| Noise | 55 | – |
| Treadwear | 79 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 61 |
| Efficiency | 74 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
PremiumContact 6
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Continental PremiumContact 6 finished ahead 2 times and Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | PremiumContact 6 | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% | 97% | +2.8 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 99% | +1.0 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% | 96% | −1.8 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 99% | +0.3 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/8 | #6/8 | – | 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2019 Auto Express SUV Tyre Test · 235/50 R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
“Zimska, WinterContact 870. Ljetna, Premium Contact 6. Mislim, i dalje (namjerno) furam 15 cola pa neću uzimat šrot za 50 eur kad Continental košta 80 eur.”
Based on 17 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Continental PremiumContact 6 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 113 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A - AA A | 220 - 420 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 24 | 24 |
Continental PremiumContact 6
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better treadwear, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 55 on treadwear.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 68 on dry.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 77 vs 61 on handling.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 75 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 85 vs 72 on our wet score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 68 on our dry score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 75 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
