tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact RX vs Hankook iON evo AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 66 owner reviews. How we score

iON evo AS is ahead, 73–57

Check price on Amazon · iON evo AS or ProContact RX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook iON evo AS
Tire BHankook

iON evo AS

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 66 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    iON evo AS +18
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXiON evo AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5078

    ProContact RX: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 56

    iON evo AS: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for iON evo AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 60

    Wet

    iON evo AS +14
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXiON evo AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5575

    ProContact RX: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    iON evo AS: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    No road tests of wet for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for iON evo AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Snow

    iON evo AS +10
    67
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXiON evo AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4764

    ProContact RX: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 57

    iON evo AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 67

    No road tests of snow for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for iON evo AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    iON evo AS +19
    78
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXiON evo AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5482

    ProContact RX: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 54.2 = 59

    iON evo AS: 40% × 71.5 (est.) + 60% × 82.2 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for iON evo AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 61

    Noise

    iON evo AS +14
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXiON evo AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5387

    ProContact RX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 61

    iON evo AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 87.4 = 75

    No road tests of noise for ProContact RX or iON evo AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 49

    Treadwear

    iON evo AS +26
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXiON evo AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online3880

    ProContact RX: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.3 = 49

    iON evo AS: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for iON evo AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 53

    Handling (owners)

    iON evo AS +16
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXiON evo AS
    Reviews found online5369
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ProContact RXHankook iON evo AS
Relative Score 57 73
Dry 56 74
Wet 60 74
Snow 57 67
Comfort 59 78
Noise 61 75
Treadwear 49 75
Handling (owners) 53 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ProContact RX

± 7

iON evo AS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact RX

Pros

  • Reasonable tread life for an OEM EV tire given proper maintenance
  • Cost-effective alternative compared to other expensive OEM options
  • Acceptable dry road performance under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear leading to premature replacement, particularly on heavy vehicles
  • Subpar grip in wet and snowy weather conditions
  • Concerns regarding structural durability, including reported sidewall separation
All owner themes in the ProContact RX review

Tire B iON evo AS

Pros

  • Noticeably reduced road noise compared to OEM tires
  • Improved vehicle efficiency and range/mileage per watt-hour
  • Better tread life and durability than factory-installed options

Cons

  • Subpar or disappointing traction in snow and wintry conditions
  • Mixed feedback on wet weather grip, with some finding it lacking in heavy rain or around roundabouts
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to cosmetic scuffing or potential bubbling
All owner themes in the iON evo AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact RX B · Hankook iON evo AS
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available243
Rim diameters16″ – 21″19″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A - B500 - 600 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact RX

Hankook iON evo AS

Winner: Hankook iON evo AS — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ProContact RX rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook iON evo AS scores 75 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook iON evo AS scores 78 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook iON evo AS scores 74 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook iON evo AS scores 69 vs 53 on handling.

Tire A · Continental ProContact RX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook iON evo AS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact RX or iON evo AS?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact RX or iON evo AS?

Hankook iON evo AS, 74 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact RX or iON evo AS?

Hankook iON evo AS, 74 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ProContact RX or iON evo AS?

Hankook iON evo AS, 67 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ProContact RX or iON evo AS?

Hankook iON evo AS, 75 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact RX or iON evo AS?

Hankook iON evo AS, 78 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact RX or iON evo AS?

Hankook iON evo AS, 75 vs 49 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology