tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact TX vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 43 + 910 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HT RH12 leads, 66–64 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HT RH12 or ProContact TX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HT RH12

All-Season tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Dynapro HT RH12 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6267

    ProContact TX: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    ProContact TX +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6766

    ProContact TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of wet for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    ProContact TX +1
    60
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5553

    ProContact TX: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 61

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60

    No road tests of snow for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Dynapro HT RH12 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5966

    ProContact TX: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    Dynapro HT RH12 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6375

    ProContact TX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70

    No road tests of noise for ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ProContact TX +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)64
    Reviews found online6664

    ProContact TX: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HT RH12 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProContact TXDynapro HT RH12
    Reviews found online5665
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ProContact TXHankook Dynapro HT RH12
Relative Score 64 66
Dry 64 67
Wet 68 67
Snow 61 60
Comfort 64 67
Noise 66 70
Treadwear 66 64
Handling (owners) 56 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ProContact TX

Dynapro HT RH12

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ProContact TX

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Positive

Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
r/denverlist ·2025-12-09

“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
ridgelineownersclub.com ·2012-10-28

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact TX B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available4924
Rim diameters15″ – 21″15″ – 22″
Tread depth8 - 10/32″14/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A A - B—
Treadwear warranty—40,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi54 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact TX

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — better handling, noise and dry. Where the Continental ProContact TX is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 65 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 70 vs 66 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 67 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 67 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ProContact TX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12?

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12?

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 70 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12?

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 67 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact TX or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology