Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 18 road tests and 25 + 1,593 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac is ahead, 80–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac

Quatrac

All Season

± 4

Tests 81 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 1,593 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)

“Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are good tyres. I prefer the vredestein quite comfortable tyres and quieter than the Hankook. But you can't go wrong with either of them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Quatrac +12
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 68 (est.)83
    Reviews found online6978

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    Quatrac: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 77.6 = 81

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Quatrac +19
    91
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 72 (est.)95
    Reviews found online7285

    PureContact LS: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    Quatrac: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 85.2 = 91

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    Quatrac +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 68 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6473

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 67

    Quatrac: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 72.9 = 74

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Quatrac +15
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)74
    Reviews found online5474

    PureContact LS: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 54 = 59

    Quatrac: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 73.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    Quatrac +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 66 (est.)78
    Reviews found online71≈ 66 (est.)

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68

    Quatrac: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Quatrac +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 67 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6977

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 77 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac +6
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSQuatrac
    Reviews found online7076
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSQuatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests–73
Scores at a glance
Continental PureContact LS vs Vredestein Quatrac: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental PureContact LSVredestein Quatrac
Relative Score 69 80
Dry 69 81
Wet 72 91
Snow 67 74
Comfort 59 74
Noise 68 74
Treadwear 68 75
Handling (owners) 70 76
Efficiency – 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

PureContact LS

± 4

Quatrac

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B Quatrac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces

Cons

  • Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
  • Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
All owner themes in the Quatrac review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental PureContact LS

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers viewing it as one of the best mid-range all-weather tires available. Users frequently praise its reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions, along with its quiet and comfortable ride compared to rivals. While some owners note that stopping distances on ice or deep snow do not match dedicated winter tires and tread wear can vary, most consider it an exceptional value over premium brands like Michelin.

Top themes
#mid-range tire value#snow and winter performance#wet weather traction#quiet and comfortable ride#tread life longevity#all-weather capability

Based on 34 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Vredestein Quatrac
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—39
Rim diameters—15″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG700 A A180 A B
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

Vredestein Quatrac

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac scores 91 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 67 on snow.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

PureContact LS or Quatrac?

Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 91 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 67 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 68 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology