Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 33 reviews
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Continental SportContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
SportContact 6 is ahead, 69–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 12 tests Owners 56 · 665 reviews
“Back when it was released, John reported something along the lines of: “Continental says the wear issues of the SportContact 6 are resolved in the new SportContact 7, and that they should match the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S in terms of wear.” I’ve had both generations, including on the same car, and can confirm the SC6 wears much quicker than the SC7, which I’m running at the moment, BTW. I didn’t even manage to get to 20k km on either of my two AMGs with the factory-fitted SC6, so your high mileage is quite the feat IMO haha. I reckon you’ll be just fine with the SC7 with your setup (car + driving style).”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
SportContact 6 +1581Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 87 Reviews found online 65 73 -
65
Wet
SportContact 6 +1580Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 86 Reviews found online 64 70 -
–
Snow
No comparison37Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 6 Reviews found online – 16 -
58
Comfort
SportContact 6 +1068Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 48 62 -
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online – 70 -
50
Treadwear
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +248Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 6 Reviews found online 39 35 -
61
Handling
SportContact 6 +667Why this score
Source Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat SportContact 6 Reviews found online 61 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | Continental SportContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 69 |
| Dry | 66 | 81 |
| Wet | 65 | 80 |
| Snow | – | 37 |
| Comfort | 58 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 48 |
| Handling | 61 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
SportContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
- Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
- Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
- Elevated road noise as the tires age
Tire B SportContact 6
Pros
- Staggering grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Precise steering feedback and sharp cornering response
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort compared to some rivals
Cons
- Rapid tread wear leading to a short lifespan (often requiring replacement under 10,000-15,000 miles)
- Reduced performance and potential snap oversteer in cold or freezing weather conditions
- High cost per mile due to fast wear rates
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental SportContact 6
The community generally views the Continental SportContact 6 as a high-performance summer tire that suffers from notably fast tread wear compared to competitors like Michelin and the newer SportContact 7. While some users report exceptionally low mileage limits, others have managed long lifespans depending on driving style, though consensus points to rapid wear as its main drawback.
Based on 6 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat | B · Continental SportContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 97 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Continental SportContact 6
Winner: Continental SportContact 6 — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental SportContact 6 scores 81 vs 66 on dry.
Continental SportContact 6 scores 80 vs 65 on wet.
Continental SportContact 6 scores 68 vs 58 on comfort.
Continental SportContact 6 scores 67 vs 61 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.